2. 职称英语
  3. Human memory is notoriously unreliable. Even people with the sharpest facial-

Human memory is notoriously unreliable. Even people with the sharpest facial-

游客2023-08-08  55
问题    Human memory is notoriously unreliable. Even people with the sharpest facial-recognition skills can only remember so much.
   It’ s tough to quantify how good a person is at remembering. No one really knows how many different faces someone can recall, for example, but various estimates tend to hover in the thousands—based on the number of acquaintances a person might have.
   Machines aren’ t limited this way. Give the right computer a massive database of faces, and it can process what it sees—then recognize a face it’ s told to find—with remarkable speed and precision. This skill is what supports the enormous promise of facial-recognition software in the 21st century. It’ s also what makes contemporary surveillance systems so scary.
   The thing is, machines still have limitations when it comes to facial recognition. And scientists are only just beginning to understand what those constraints are. To begin to figure out how computers are struggling, researchers at the University of Washington created a massive database of faces—they call it MegaFace—and tested a variety of facial-recognition algorithms (算法) as they scaled up in complexity. The idea was to test the machines on a database that included up to 1 million different images of nearly 700,000 different people—and not just a large database featuring a relatively small number of different faces, more consistent with what’s been used in other research.
   As the databases grew, machine accuracy dipped across the board. Algorithms that were right 95% of the time when they were dealing with a 13,000-image database, for example, were accurate about 70% of the time when confronted with 1 million images. That’ s still pretty good, says one of the researchers, Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. " Much better than we expected," she said.
   Machines also had difficulty adjusting for people who look a lot alike—either doppelgangers (长相极相似的人) , whom the machine would have trouble identifying as two separate people, or the same person who appeared in different photos at different ages or in different lighting, whom the machine would incorrectly view as separate people.
   "Once we scale up, algorithms must be sensitive to tiny changes in identities and at the same time invariant to lighting, pose, age," Kemelmacher-Shlizerman said.
   The trouble is, for many of the researchers who ’ d like to design systems to address these challenges, massive datasets for experimentation just don’ t exist—at least, not in formats that are accessible to academic researchers. Training sets like the ones Google and Facebook have are private. There are no public databases that contain millions of faces. MegaFace’ s creators say it’ s the largest publicly available facial-recognition dataset out there.
   " An ultimate face recognition algorithm should perform with billions of people in a dataset," the researchers wrote. [br] What is said to be a shortcoming of facial-recognition machines?
选项 A、They cannot easily tell apart people with near-identical appearances.
B、They have difficulty identifying changes in facial expressions.
C、They are not sensitive to minute changes in people’ s mood.
D、They have problems distinguishing people of the same age.
答案 A
解析 细节题。原文第六段指出，机器对于识别看起来很像的人还是有困难的——比如长相极相似的人，机器很难辨别出他们是不同的人；或者同一个人，在不同照片上以不同的年龄或在不同的灯光下出现，机器也会错误地将其辨别成不同的人。由此可知，机器的缺点是在识别长相很相似的人方面有困难，故答案为A。原文并未提及对面部表情和情绪方面的识别，故排除B、C。D项与原文不符，原文指的是机器在区分同一个人在不同年龄或者是在不同的灯光下出现时会出现错误，并不是在区分相同年龄的人方面有问题，故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2909351.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)