首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] A recent study overturned what we think we know about lying.
[originaltext] A recent study overturned what we think we know about lying.
游客
2023-08-04
73
管理
问题
A recent study overturned what we think we know about lying. Most of us have a theory about how to tell if someone is telling a lie. We may develop that theory from observations of those people we know well and see regularly, but we tend to generalize what we gather from that unscientific daily research and make it a universal theory.
So we might imagine that liars have evasive eyes, or the opposite—they simply stare at you. Or perhaps it is more generally nervous behavior we associate with lies. Whatever the particular theory, it’s usually based on close observation of people we know. And we get lots of practice. On average, we’re lied to some 200 times per day. These are mostly harmless lies, but lies nonetheless.
But there’s a problem with our theories, even though they’re based on all these observations. The average person—you and me—tested rigorously on how well we detect lies fails to do better than chance. That’s well established over many studies and lots of attempts by researchers to work out reliable ways to detect lies. It’s even relatively easy to fool lie detectors, the gold standard of lie detection, by training yourself in breathing techniques and symptom suppression.
Is there any way to get better at detecting lies? The new research offers some surprising advice. Stop looking and listen instead. It turns out that if we’re unable to see the face, but rather focus on the voice of the person in question, our accuracy rate improves considerably.
12. According to the passage, how do most people detect lying?
13. What does the passage say about most lies?
14. What have many studies uncovered about the average person’s lie detection?
15. What advice does the new research offer regarding lie detection?
选项
A、Mostly by chance.
B、Basically objective.
C、Subject to their mental alertness.
D、Dependent on their analytical ability.
答案
A
解析
细节推断题。原文中提到,如果对像你和我这样的普通人进行严格的辨别谎言的测试,我们做得不比凑巧得出的结果好多少。许多为找出可靠的谎言检测方法所做的研究和为此进行了大量尝试的研究人员都可以充分证实这一结果。也就是说,普通人对于谎言的辨别也不过是凑巧而已。因此答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2896795.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Well,mytopictodayisthedoctor-patientrelationship.All
A、Thematerialsforindoorplumbinghavebeenimproved.B、Thehousesrecentlybu
[originaltext]Over1,000peoplegetstruckbylightningeveryyearintheU
[originaltext]W:Excuseme.I’mlookingforsomeonewhocanhelpmewiththete
[originaltext]Somepeople’searsproducewaxlikebusylittlebees.Thisca
[originaltext]AnancientGreekphilosopheroncewrotethatlaughteriswhat
[originaltext]M:First,Iwanttothankyouforagreeingtothissurvey.Thisi
C根据的research、inrecentyears和teacherquality定位到C段。该段说,真正有区别的,比班级规模和教科书、教学方法甚至课程设
E根据Onerecentreview定位到E段最后一句。McKinsey&Co.近期一次调查显示,多数中小学招聘的教师都是那些与大学挂钩的高中里最差的学生。
[originaltext]Jeansarepants,ortrousers,madefromdenim.Mainlydesigne
随机试题
[originaltext]IntelbasedinCaliforniahasgonefromstrengthtostrengths
WhichofthefollowingsentencesdoesNOTcontainanominalclause?A、Itwasdoub
NewYear’sresolutionsarethosespeciallittlepromisesyou(1)_____tobel
A.三角巾悬吊 B.切开复位钢板内固定 C.手法复位悬垂石膏固定 D.横"
男性,56岁,近1周腹痛,近3天乏力、头昏,逐渐出现活动时心慌、气短,平卧时缓解
杜仲盐炙的炮制要求是A.文火炒干 B.文火炒至焦黑色 C.中火炒至有焦斑,丝
判断肺结核的传染性,最主要的依据是A.病灶有空洞 B.结核菌素试验阳性 C.
有一项年金,前5年无流入,后4年每年年末流入100万元,假设年利率为10%,下列
在现金流量分析中,下列公式中,不正确的是( )。A.经营净收益=净利润+非经营净
美国精神病学者罗斯认为临终病人心理发展经历的五个阶段,顺序正确的是A、否认与震惊
最新回复
(
0
)