2. 职称英语
  3. Flexible Study for the Future Un

Flexible Study for the Future Un

游客2023-08-04  28
问题                                                 Flexible Study for the Future Universities
    A) For a brief period, the popular image of the university student was embodied by Sebastian of Brideshead Revisited: 18-years old, male, privileged, and ready to spend three years in one of the world’s most elite institutions. But the idea of a typical student no longer holds: today’s students are just as likely to be female, or older, or from overseas, or studying part-time while holding down a full-time job.
    B) Traditional models of provision (供给) no longer work for these students. But how can universities adapt to meet their need—and the needs of the modern global economy? Conditions of Flexibility, published by Professor Ron Barnett, looks at how universities can offer more flexible structures and the conditions under which flexibility can flourish. Using the report as a starting point, a recent Guardian roundtable (圆桌会议) sponsored by the Higher Education Academy brought together a group of experts and senior managers in higher education to discuss the future of flexible learning.
    Integrity
    C) The roundtable heard that flexibility is an essential part of a modern higher education system. "The 21st century is calling for new kinds of persons, who can adapt and respond flexibly to the extraordinary challenges we see day in and day out," said one participant. The challenge is how to meet the needs of those students without losing internal integrity, he argued.
    D) Many universities are working hard to develop flexible approaches that match students to the employment needs of the economy. One participant described how her university works with local employers to create tailored programmes for individuals. "Students will come in to talk about their aspirations, their past experiences, their qualifications, their jobs, and a customized opportunity will be created for them, which will pick up modules (模块) and put them into a special package for that individual student," she said. While universities are encouraged to think in a more focused fashion about the specific requirements of the workplace, many also want to equip students with a broader range of skills that enable them to adapt to the demands of a rapidly changing world. Some degree programmes are moving away from the traditional modular (模块的，分单元的) approach—where undergraduates might take 10 short modules a year—to a system of longer courses. One participant said that her institution has built flexibility into this new model: "A student might be asked to undertake a particular activity designed to develop a particular aspect of their skills—maybe their critical thinking or their employability skills—but they can choose where they do it within the framework of their discipline." An immunology (免疫学的) student, for example, could choose to apply their skills to HIV/Aids or heart disease.
    F) Flexibility is also being introduced into assessment. At one university, students on a particular master’s programme take five modules, each of which can be assessed in five different ways and students choose which assessment method they prefer for each module.
    G) Another participant described the experimental introduction in one degree course of an option that enables students to study the same module twice, "in order to learn better or differently than they did the first time", with students being assessed separately each time. The roundtable also heard about the role technology can play in providing students with greater flexibility in how they learn. One participant talked about his university’s use of "lecture capture"—recording lectures so that students could watch them again, an innovation that has been embraced with enthusiasm by both staff and students. Other participants argued for a move away from the didactic (说教的) approach of the 50-minute lecture altogether, and in favor of more active methods of teaching. One spoke of a master’s course in which psychology students learning to be expert witnesses worked with law students and computer science students on a simulated criminal trial of a murder case. "It ended up being an incredibly rich multi-professional experience that mimic (模仿) the real world," she said.
    H) Perhaps one of the biggest flexible learning innovations has been the introduction of massive open online courses (Mooes), which enable students to study university-level courses at a distance and for free, using Internet-based resources. Advocates believe
    that Mooes are democratic, opening higher education up to people who would not normally be able to access it. Roundtable participants were largely skeptical about the disruptive (引起混乱的) potential of Mooes, with one arguing that "most of the people who participate in Mooes are PhDs or academics. There are huge levels of dropout, and the quality is pretty poor."
    I) What are the challenges to providing more flexible learning in higher education? Some participants felt that students are not ready to learn flexibly, and prefer a traditional model of teaching through lectures and assessment through essays and exams. One argued that many students are unused to choice: "When they arrive as undergraduates, they’re so used to being told exactly what to do and how they’ll be examined that when we get them into university and give them more choices, they don’t know what to choose." Students’ reluctance to embrace innovation means that universities should take care when introducing flexibility, one participant argued: "We’ve got a responsibility to try to make sure we structure learning in such a way that students are encouraged to explore outside their comfort zone and engage in different learning approaches, but are unable to default to the lowest common denominator."
    Quality Assurance Agency
    J) Some academics too are cautious about adopting flexible learning methods, the roundtable heard. The Quality Assurance Agency (QAA), a regulatory body that monitors standards in higher education, publishes standard statements: a set of guidelines for what students should be taught in each subject.
    K) One participant said: "There is a risk aversion around quality and standards because staffs are terribly nervous about getting a poor QAA rating. Perhaps they see standard statements as being gospel (真理) , and they have to deliver to those benchmark statements rather than considering threshold concepts and letting students just explore between them."
    L) Although universities are working hard to develop flexible provision, some participants acknowledged that, both in the structure of courses offered and in methods of teaching and learning, progress is patchy (参差不齐的). "This sort of exciting innovative activity is going on only in part of the university, not across the institution," said one. "The challenge for university management is the day-today pressures of resource management, and time to balance the budget with this innovative way of working."
    M) But it was acknowledged that universities, despite the best of intentions, operate under external constraints. Progress has been slow in the area of student mobility, for example. Increasingly, said one participant, universities must recognize "the desire of students to be mobile on the international stage and to take a great number of credits in different countries and to get work experience in those different settings but still wanting to get a degree that puts that all together."
    N) There is a tension, one participant pointed out, between "good words and actual policy". While successive governments have talked about the importance of increasing flexibility and being employer-led, they operate "a funding and policy model which goes back to thinking about 18-year-olds doing three-year degree programmes and going on to a master’s if they want." Until governments catch up with the realities of the new higher education landscape, universities may find it hard to provide the flexibility students and employers need. [br] Other participants thought colleges should give up the didactic approach of class and adopt a more active way of teaching.
选项
答案 G
解析 题干意为，其他与会者认为大学应该放弃说教式的授课方式，采用更积极的方法教学。根据题干中的关键词give up，didactic approach和active way可定位到G段。该段第四句提到，其他与会者提到应改变传统课堂50分钟的说教式的授课方式，采用更积极的教学方式。由此可知，题干是对原文的同义转述，故选G。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2896675.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)