首页
登录
职称英语
What Do the Humanities Teach Us?
What Do the Humanities Teach Us?
游客
2023-08-04
24
管理
问题
What Do the Humanities Teach Us?
A) Humanities professors have come up with a seemingly foolproof (不会错的) defense against those who trash degrees in, say, English literature or philosophy as wasted tuition dollars, one-way tickets to unemployment. Oh no, we say—the humanities prepare students to succeed in the working world just as well as all those alleged practical majors, maybe even better.
B) We offer tools of thought. We teach our students to understand and analyze complex ideas. We help them develop powers of expression, written and verbal. The lengthy essays we assign enhance their capacity to do independent work. At our best, we teach them how to reason—and reasoning undergirds (从底层加强,巩固) every successful professional project. In the short term, such a defense may seem effective. But it is dead wrong.
C) In the Chronicle of Higher Education, a distinguished humanities scholar recently wrote with pride about a student of his, a classics major, who wrote brilliantly on Spinoza yet plans to become a military surgeon. A recent article in Business Insider offered "11 Reasons to Ignore the Haters and Major in the Humanities." For example: You’ll be able to do things machines can’t do in a service economy. You’ll learn to explain and sell an idea. You’ll stand out in the crowd in the coming STEM glut (供应过剩). In the same publication, Bracken Darnell, the chief executive of Logitech, talked about why he loves hiring English majors: "The best CEOs and leaders are extremely good writers and have this ability to articulate and verbalize what they’re thinking."
D) Some of my colleagues are getting quite aggressive about this line of reasoning. "I think we actually do a better job getting people ready for law school and business than the people in economics do," a good friend who teaches humanities told me not long ago. It seems that there’s no problem, then. Want success? Come on in, our tent flap is open.
I) But the humanities are not about success. They’re about questioning success—and every important social value. Socrates taught us this, and we shouldn’t forget it. Sure, someone who studies literature or philosophy is learning to think clearly and write well. But those skills are means to an end. That end, as Plato said, is learning how to live one’s life. "This discussion is not about any chance question," Plato’s Socrates says in The Republic, "but about the way one should live."
F) That’s what’s at the heart of the humanities—informed, thoughtful dialogue about the way we ought to conduct life. This dialogue honors no pieties: All positions are debatable; all values are up for discussion. Ralph Waldo Emerson speaks for the spirit of the humanities in Self-Reliance when he says that we "must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness." He will not accept what the world calls "good" without consideration. He’ll look into it as Socrates did and see if it actually is good.
G) When Montaigne doubts received opinions and asks himself what he really knows and what he does not, he is acting in the spirit of the humanities. "Que sais-Je?" or "What do I know?" was his motto.
H) Socrates, who probably concentrates the spirit of the humanities better than anyone, spent his time rambling around Athens asking people if they thought they were living virtuous lives. He believed that his city was getting proud and lazy, like an overfed thoroughbred horse, and that it needed him, the stinging gadfly (牛虻) , to wake it up. The Athenians had to ask themselves if the lives they were leading really were good. Socrates didn’t help them work their way to success; he helped them work their way to insight and virtue.
I) Now, Americans are in love with success—success for their children in particular. As a parent of sons in their 20s, I understand this and sympathize with it. But our job as humanists isn’t to second whatever values happen to be in place in society. We’re here to question those values and maybe—using the best that has been thought and said— offer alternatives.
J) We commonly think in binaries (对,双). Vanilla (香草) is the opposite of chocolate. The opposite of success—often defined today as high-status work and a big paycheck—is failure. But the great books tell us that this is not necessarily true. Think of Henry David Thoreau’s life of voluntary poverty and his dedication to nature and writing. Some of my students have cultivated values similar to Thoreau’s and have done so at least in part through the study of the humanities. They’ve become environmental activists and park rangers. Or they have worked modestly paid jobs to spend all the time they can outdoors. They are not failures. Nor are those who work for the poor, or who explore their artistic talents, or who enlist in the military. These students are usually not in pursuit of traditional success. They have often been inspired by work they’ve encountered in humanities courses—and, for a time at least, they are choosing something other than middle-class corporate life.
K) The humanities are not against conventional success; far from it. Many of our students go on to distinguished careers in law and business. But I like to think they do so with a fuller social and self-awareness than most people. For they have approached success as a matter of debate, not as an idol of worship. They have considered the options. They have called "success" into question and, after due consideration, they have decided to pursue it. I have to imagine that such people are far better employees than those who have moved lockstep (因循守旧) into their occupations. I also believe that self-aware, questioning people tend to be far more successful in the long run.
L) What makes humanities students different isn’t their power of expression, their capacity to frame an argument or their ability to do independent work. Yes, these are valuable qualities, and we humanities teachers try to cultivate them. But true humanities students are exceptional because they have been, and are, engaged in the activity that Plato commends—seeking to understand themselves and how they ought to lead their lives.
M) If some of our current defenders have their way, the humanities will survive, but in name only. The humanities will become synonymous (同义的) with unreflective training for corporate success. What would Socrates think? [br] The author thinks their job as humanists is to question the popular values in society and provide people with different choices.
选项
答案
I
解析
题干意为,作者认为他们作为人文学者的任务就是去质疑社会中流行的价值观,并为人们提供不同的选择。根据题干中的关键词their job as humanists可定位到I段。该段最后两句提到,但是作为人文学者,我们的工作不是赞同社会中任何一种恰好大行其道的价值观。我们的存在是要质疑这些价值观并且或许——利用已有的思想和言论的精华——提供备选。由此可知,题干是对原文的同义转述,故选I。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2896649.html
相关试题推荐
A、Thecombinationofscienceandhumanities.B、Solutionstoambiguity,doubt,an
A、valuebothscienceandhumanitiesB、putfactsandfiguresbeforestatistictC、
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
WhatDotheHumanitiesTeachUs?
随机试题
[originaltext]M:DoyouhaveclassesonWednesday,Liza?W:No,Idon’t.Anysu
B
在市场营销费用预算编制中,销售人员工资归属于销售交易类费用。()
影响墙体热工性能的参数,下列哪几项是正确的?()A.各材料层及内外表面热阻
急性DIC过程中,各种凝血因子均可显著减少,其中减少量最为突出的是A.凝血酶原
20世纪90年代,陕西章台出土了一些秦代封泥(密封信件文书时加盖了印章的泥块),
简述劳动标准的结构。
基于人民警察的性质,人民警察不得散布有损于国家声誉、形象和威信的口头或书面言论;
某男性患者,29岁。因车祸发生腹股沟处大量出血,现场医务工作者应该采取的止血方法
道路选线难以避开地质缺陷,但尽可能使路线()。A.处于顺向坡上方 B.处
最新回复
(
0
)