首页
登录
职称英语
In 2010, Pamela Fink, an employee of a Connecticut energy company, made a ne
In 2010, Pamela Fink, an employee of a Connecticut energy company, made a ne
游客
2023-07-19
32
管理
问题
In 2010, Pamela Fink, an employee of a Connecticut energy company, made a new kind of discrimination claim: she charged that she had been fired because she carries genes that make her more likely to get cancer. Fink quickly became the public face for the cutting edge of civil rights: genetic discrimination.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) , which was passed out of concern for just such cases in the wake of huge advances in genetics testing, took effect in late 2009. GINA, as it is known, makes it illegal for employers to fire or refuse to hire workers based on their " genetic information"—including genetic tests and family history of disease. When Congress issued GINA in 2008, the House of Representatives supported it 414-1, and the whole Senate backed it.
There are two major reasons that so many people—even congressional Republicans who are highly doubtful of civil rights laws—like GINA. First, there is the kind of discrimination it is aimed at: penalizing people for DNA and RNA that they inherited from their parents through no fault of their own. In general, our society has decided to protect people for qualities that are "immutable"—that is, something about them that is impossible or, at least, very difficult to change. So we make it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, skin color and sex. Genes are a classic immutable characteristic : outside of some complicated medical procedures, we’re pretty much stuck with the genes we were bom with.
The second major reason genetic-discrimination laws are popular is that this is a kind of bias everyone feels they could be exposed to. None of us has perfect genes—and for the most part, we have no idea what is hiding in our DNA and RNA. Our genes are complex enough that we all have some negative information—and none of us wants to lose a job or be denied insurance over it. When juries begin to hear these cases, they are far more likely to identify with the accusers than with the companies that discriminate. That doesn’t mean that there won’t be plenty of companies looking to benefit from genetic information , but if they use it, they may well have to pay. [br] What is probably the attitude of juries towards accusers of genetic-discrimination cases?
选项
A、Indignant.
B、Impartial.
C、Indifferent.
D、Supportive.
答案
D
解析
推理判断题。本题考查陪审团在基因歧视案件中的态度。定位句中的identify with意为“同情”。由定位句可知,当陪审团审理这些基因歧视案件时,他们非常有可能同情原告而不是歧视原告的公司。由此推断,D)“支持的”正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2849812.html
相关试题推荐
Thecompanymighthavesufferedmuchmoredamage______(要不是他及时发现大火).ifhehadn’t
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
In2010,PamelaFink,anemployeeofaConnecticutenergycompany,madeane
In2010,PamelaFink,anemployeeofaConnecticutenergycompany,madeane
[originaltext]WeexperiencedifferentformsoftheSun’senergyeveryday.
随机试题
RupertBrookeRupertBrooke,oneoftheleading
InEnglandrecentlythreeforeigngentlemenapproachedabusstop.Theystud
下列装帧工艺材料中,能用于精装书壳的有( )。A.棉织物 B.化纤织物 C
HTML页面的“<title>主页</title>”代码应写在()标记内。A
《彝族舞曲》是娄树华根据彝族民歌四大腔中的“海菜腔”的音乐素材改编创作的。
下列关于发包人支付担保的阐述中,正确的有()。A:可由担保公司提供担保 B:
急性单核细胞白血病A.B细胞增殖B.粒细胞增殖C.浆细胞增殖D.单核细胞增殖E.
个体在面对问题情境时,在规定的时间内能产生大量不同的观念,这表明其思维具有()。
处方的调配人、核对人未对麻醉药品和第一类精神药品处方进行核对A.造成严重后果的,
由于承包人原因使工程未在约定的工期内竣工的,对原约定竣工日期后继续施工的工程进行
最新回复
(
0
)