首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
19
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847348.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
AnewreportreleasedbytheAmericanFederationofTeachers(AFT)remindsu
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
随机试题
DuringthenextseveralweeksIwentcompletelytothewolves.Itookatiny
LanguageDespitethefactthatmanydefinitionsoflanguagehavebeenproposed,
为了保证招聘成效评估的客观性与准确性,饭店应对()作出评估。A.招聘信度
在道路旅客运输合同履行中,承运人的主要义务包括()。A.保证运输安全 B.及
A.蓝色B.绿色C.紫色D.红色E.黄色革兰染色阴性菌呈
SF6断路器均压环脱落后产生明显可见蓝色晕光应定性为(____)缺陷。(A)危急
企业在设计薪酬制度时,第一步是( )。A.明确现状和需求 B.工作分析 C
19世纪30~40年代,欧洲爆发了三次大规模的工人运动。标志着无产阶级已经觉醒,
石油化工检修阶段进行设备内作业时,凡是进入石油、化工生产区域的罐、塔、釜、槽、球
污水处理厂未封闭的油水重力分离设施释放异味物质主要源于( )。A.质量蒸发 B
最新回复
(
0
)