首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
20
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847348.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
AnewreportreleasedbytheAmericanFederationofTeachers(AFT)remindsu
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
随机试题
TheVikings’VoyagetoEternitySincetheMerovingianAge
角膜的神经来源于A.面神经 B.三叉神经 C.滑车神经 D.动眼神经 E
用显色指数对光源的显色性进行定量的评价,Ra值越大()。A.光源的显色性越差
污水三级处理一般不包括哪些工艺()。A、生物脱氮除磷 B、混凝沉淀 C、过滤
患者男性,47岁,门静脉高压症,脾大,脾功能亢进,拟行断流术及脾切除术插胃管的时
( )是出生后头半年婴儿认知发展的重要里程碑,也是手的真正触觉探索的开始。A.
下面是选自毛泽东的《新民主主义论》一文中的材料: 材料1 然而中国资产阶级民
A.5° B.30° C.45° D.90° E.135°前牙3/4冠切
混凝土板主要承受()的共同作用。A.轴力和弯矩 B.轴力和扭矩 C.弯矩和剪
结核性脑膜炎的脑神经损害不包括下列哪对A.Ⅶ B.Ⅲ C.Ⅳ D.Ⅵ E
最新回复
(
0
)