首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
28
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847348.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
AnewreportreleasedbytheAmericanFederationofTeachers(AFT)remindsu
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
随机试题
Hadhekeptaneyeonthebusiness,______(他的公司肯定会度过危机).hisfirmwouldhavegot
Languageswillcontinuetodiverse.EvenifEnglishweretobecometheunive
Canadaistheworld’s______withthelandareaofabout10millionsquarekilome
【B1】[br]【B9】A、lateB、earlyC、previousD、priorA此处考查的是“晚期”的表达法,用late,早期用early。
Ourenthusiasmdiffersfromthatofyoun
室内测定抗剪强度的试验仪器有:()A.开口钢环式十字板剪切仪 B.无侧限抗压强
根据下面资料,回答 Readingaloudandsilentread
在建设项目中,项目投资完成后所进行的评价是()。A:项目中间评价 B:项目事
阅读以下文字。 阅读以下文字。 生物柴油一直被誉为是减少我们对化石燃料依赖
某法院在审理一行政案件中认为某地方性法规与国家法律相抵触。根据我国宪法和法律的规
最新回复
(
0
)