首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
22
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The election didn’t have representativeness because ______.
选项
A、the results of the election were hardly persuasive
B、only a small percentage of students participated in the election
C、the election was not organized in a constructive way
D、the teachers involved are not given details of the reasons for voting
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847346.html
相关试题推荐
Onlywithcombinedeffortsofallthestudentsandteachers,______(我们才能期望我们学校出现新
Theteacherwasinagoodmoodand______(决定不惩罚那些上课迟到的学生).decidednottopunisht
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
Hisperformanceinthetestis(satisfy)______,butthereisstillroomforim
Asmenage,theytypicallygetlessandlessdeepsleep—afactthatcould【B1
前庭水管的外口位于颞骨岩部A.后面 B.尖端 C.底面 D.前面 E.下
同时服用,有利于铁吸收的药物是()A:维生素A:B:维生素B C:维生素C
沥青玛蹄脂碎石是工程中常用的骨架-空隙结构。()
消防安全重点单位的界定程序不包括()。A.申报B.告知 C.公告D.考核
对我国公安机关的专政职能与民主职能的关系理解正确的有( )A.公安机关专政职能
4P营销组合包括()。A:产品 B:价格 C:分销渠道 D:人员 E:促
(2021年真题)根据《全国重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程总体规划(2021-2
施工合同示范文本规定可以顺延工期的条件有()。A.不可抗力 B.承包人的违约
最新回复
(
0
)