首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
34
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The election didn’t have representativeness because ______.
选项
A、the results of the election were hardly persuasive
B、only a small percentage of students participated in the election
C、the election was not organized in a constructive way
D、the teachers involved are not given details of the reasons for voting
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847346.html
相关试题推荐
Onlywithcombinedeffortsofallthestudentsandteachers,______(我们才能期望我们学校出现新
Theteacherwasinagoodmoodand______(决定不惩罚那些上课迟到的学生).decidednottopunisht
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
[originaltext]Somepeoplechoosetotightlygraspthepastandstaystuckinth
G根据lesslikelyto和visitsbynurses定位到G段。根据J.AM.A.几年前的一项研究,在纽约北部,母亲在怀孕时期和产后两年内得到家
AirlineAlliancesCooperativecompetition.Competitivecoope
对需进行地质编录的工程隐蔽部位,承包人应报请( )进行地质编录,并及时告知监理
每种tRNA能识别( )。A.一种氨基酰-tRNA合成酶、ATP和一种氨基酸
症见血崩量多,血色紫黑稠黏,手足心热,腰膝酸软,舌红,脉弦数。治宜选用A.归脾
《最高人民法院关于适用(中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法)的解释》第386条规定,除检察
(2017年真题)甲借款给乙,约定于2018年3月1日前还清本息,丙
根据《水污染防治法》,国务院和省、自治区、直辖市人民政府根据水环境保护的需要,规
由聚氯乙烯塑料与低碳钢板复合而成的塑料-钢复合材料,除能够耐酸、碱、油等侵蚀外,
最新回复
(
0
)