首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
35
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847344.html
相关试题推荐
Forthisproblem,ourteacher’sideaisthat______(那个计划应该立即执行).theplan(should)b
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.TheWo
[originaltext]M:Hi,Minnie,howareyoudoing?W:Prettygood.Thanks.Haveyo
促进家庭健康的方式包括()。A.沟通 B.家庭心理咨询 C.营造良好的家庭环
胆囊结石并发急性胆石性胰腺炎的病理解剖条件中哪一项是错误的A.胆囊多发小结石
已知2010年该省限额以下批发和零售企业零售额相比于2009年同期增幅为18
“从此上下!”标示牌式样尺寸为()mm。(A)200*60(B)250*25
在民事诉讼时效期间的最后6个月内,权利人因不可抗力或者其他障碍不能行使请求权的,
案例六: 一般资料:求助者,男性,41岁,高中毕业,已婚。 案例介绍:半年多
关于房地产投资方案风险测度评价的说法,正确的是()。A:标准差越小的方案,风险越
A.pH7.38,PaO50mmHg,PaCO40mmHg B.pH7.30,
最新回复
(
0
)