首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
47
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847344.html
相关试题推荐
Forthisproblem,ourteacher’sideaisthat______(那个计划应该立即执行).theplan(should)b
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
CanHurricanesbeModeratedorD
MASSWASTINGPROCESSES1Thedownslopemovementofrock,mud
Helendidknowsomethings,though.Mostoftheseshehadlearnedfromherse
Moresurprising,perhaps,thanthecurrentdifficultiesoftraditionalmarri
Anapplicationarchitecturespecifiesth
关于异位妊娠的临床表现说法错误的是A、有6~8周的停经史 B、突感下腹一侧撕裂
能治疗心悸失眠的药物是A.薏苡仁 B.附子 C.茯苓 D.猪苓 E.玉米
新投运GIS采用带金属法兰的盆式绝缘子时,应预留窗口用于特高频局部(____)。
二氧化碳∶珊瑚骨骼∶腐蚀A.物种灭绝∶动物∶威胁 B.天灾人祸∶物种∶减少
标准分数是( )。因此,可以做加减运算,而不能做乘除运算A.命名量表 B.顺
最新回复
(
0
)