首页
登录
职称英语
Do we need cities any more I don’t want to live in
Do we need cities any more I don’t want to live in
游客
2023-07-18
23
管理
问题
Do we need cities any more
I don’t want to live in a city. Perhaps we divide naturally into two types: those for whom cities are vibrant and exciting, a focus for human activity; and those for whom they are dirty, noisy and dangerous. It may be unfashionable, but I’m in the latter camp. I do not believe that we are a species whose behavior improves in overcrowded conditions.
A new study proposes a significant increase in the capacity of towns and cities through a combination of increased housing densities, lower on-plot provision for cars and more on-street parking, and the re-use of marginal open space that is empty of any amenity value. The benefit of this approach is to reduce the loss of green fields and to help "move towards more sustainable patterns of development".
This study suggests that it would be possible to achieve a 25% increase in density in a typical provincial city without changing the traditional street scene, although it would be necessary to reduce the size of the houses and substitute parking spaces for garages. Therefore, the cost of this approach is to have more people living in smaller homes at higher densities, along streets that are lined with parked cars. Can we really accept the notion that space within dwellings may be reduced even further? In times when, we are told, living standards are rising in real terms, is it realistic to seek to reduce personal space standards?
The streets of many inner suburbs are already lined with cars on both sides, reducing movement to a single lane. Increasing densities means accepting urban streets that are designed as linear car parks, bounded by even smaller living units and modified only by occasional trees growing from the tarmac. Would the benefits of higher density be worth the disadvantages of increasing on-street parking? Can we achieve a satisfactory visual environment from such raw materials? Higher urban densities may be communally good for us, but they will fail to meet the desire of many prospective home owners.
Those without economic choice can be directed to live in this way, but if we are to continue to rely on the private sector to produce this urban housing, it will need to appeal to the private developers’ customers. Who will choose to live in these high-density developments of small dwellings, with minimal open space and a chance to park on the highway if you are lucky enough to find a space? The main consumers will be single people, couples without children, and perhaps some "empty nesters". These are people who can choose to spend much of their time outside their home, making the most of those urban cultural opportunities or getting away at weekends to a country cottage of sporting activities.
The combination of a young family and a mortgage restricts the mobility and spending power of many couples. Most people with a family will try to avoid bringing up their children in an overcrowded flat or house. Space for independent activity is important in developing the individual and in maintaining family balance. The garden is the secure place where the children can work off excess energy.
There is danger that planners may take a dispassionate, logical view of how we should live, and seek to force society into that shape. A few years ago a European Commission study provided a good example of this. It took the view, quite sensibly, that housing should not be under-occupied because this is a waste of resources. Therefore, it would be much better if the many thousands of old ladies who live alone in large detached houses would move into small urban flats, thus releasing the large houses for families. What the study failed to recognize was that many of those old ladies prefer to continue to live in their family home with their familiar surroundings and, most importantly, with their memories. What is good for us is not necessarily what we want.
The urban housing option may be technically sustainable, but individually unacceptable. There still seems to be a perception among planners that new housing investment can be forced into those areas that planners want to see developed, without proper consideration of where the prospective purchasers want to live. There is a fatal flaw in this premise. Housing developers run businesses. They are not unavoidably committed to building houses and they are not obliged to invest their resources in housing development. Unless there is a reasonable prospect of a profit on the capital at risk in a housing project, they may simply choose to invest in some other activity. [br] Space for independent activity contributes to creative thinking.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
C
解析
倒数第三段的第三句,原文意思为“独立活动的空间对于个人发展和家庭平衡的维护都是很重要的”,并没有提到题目所说“独立活动空间有助于创造性的思维”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2846988.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Largemoderncitiesaretoobigtocontrol.Whereveryoulook
[originaltext]Largemoderncitiesaretoobigtocontrol.Whereveryoulook
[originaltext]Largemoderncitiesaretoobigtocontrol.Whereveryoulook
DoweneedcitiesanymoreIdon’twanttolivein
DoweneedcitiesanymoreIdon’twanttolivein
DoweneedcitiesanymoreIdon’twanttolivein
DoWeNeedCitiesAnyMore?Idon’twanttoliveinaci
DoWeNeedCitiesAnyMore?Idon’twanttoliveinaci
DoWeNeedCitiesAnyMore?Idon’twanttoliveinaci
DoWeNeedCitiesAnyMore?Idon’twanttoliveinaci
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Whatarethemajorchallengesthatyouhavefacedinyourcare
SomeAdvicetoCollegeGraduatesⅠ.Adviceo
Themorepeopleyourchildencounters______(他越有可能遇上喜欢他的人).themorelikelyhew
投机方法中,属于建仓阶段内容的是()。A、选择入市时机B、平均买低和平均卖高C、金字塔式买入卖出D、合约交割月份的选择A,B,C,D当涉足期货
NonverbalCommunicationLikeallanimals,peoplecom
【教学过程】 (一)导入新课 接龙游戏复习乘法口诀:2×3=4×6=7×8=5×7= (二)新知探索 1.提出问题 课件出示主题图,学生观察,你能从图
属于雌激素的生理作用的是A.降低子宫对缩宫素的敏感性 B.使子宫内膜增生 C
根据《建筑面积计算规范》(GB/T50353-2013)规定,关于建筑面积计算正
某公司对其一批新任一线主管人员开发了为期一周的提升岗位胜任能力的培训项目。该培训
根据企业劳动争议仲裁的时效规定,当事人应当从知道或者应当知道其权利被侵害之日起(
最新回复
(
0
)