首页
登录
职称英语
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
游客
2023-07-15
65
管理
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse than the hazards of smoking mo many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer—alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down—abolished by an amendment to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20,1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunken-ness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink—or two or three. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Drinkers were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever—often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5,1933, they repealed prohibition by ratifying the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. [br] During Prohibition, people ______.
选项
A、lived in fear of the law
B、were willing to risk arrest for the pleasure of liquor
C、recklessly endangered their communities
D、were respectful of the legal sanctions placed on them
答案
B
解析
事实细节题。第三段第二行“They were willing to take risks to get it”,即说明此点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2838691.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Everywherewelook,weseeAmericansrunning.Theyrunforev
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
【B1】[br]【B16】A、stimulatedB、fannedC、firedD、providedB空前的prevent和空后的fromspre
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
随机试题
[img]2016m3x/ct_eyyjsbz2013j_eyyjsbreada_0100_20163[/img]Glaciersconsisto
H集团创建于1988年,是一家大型现代化的钢铁联合企业,凭借其产品、技术、人才、
关于铁代谢错误的说法是A.草酸可与铁结合生成难溶沉淀剂利于铁的吸收 B.Vc、
部门员工例会的功能不包括()。A.通报情况 B.决策事项 C.解决问题
公路养护工程通过验收后,验收结果应当及时向()报告。A.交通运输财务部门
男,营养状况良好,能独坐,见生人即哭,但还不会扶站,前囟1cm×1cm,下中切牙
下列关于胶体金免疫层析技术(GICA)叙述错误的是A.包括夹心法B.可采用间接法
在可行性研究报告中,项目概况部分应着重介绍( )。A、项目的合作方式和性质 B
建设单位应当将大型的人员密集场所和其他特殊建筑工程的消防设计文件报送公安机关消防
A.继发性牙本质 B.骨样牙本质 C.原发性牙本质 D.透明牙本质 E.
最新回复
(
0
)