首页
登录
职称英语
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
游客
2023-07-15
37
管理
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse than the hazards of smoking mo many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer—alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down—abolished by an amendment to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20,1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunken-ness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink—or two or three. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Drinkers were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever—often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5,1933, they repealed prohibition by ratifying the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. [br] During Prohibition, people ______.
选项
A、lived in fear of the law
B、were willing to risk arrest for the pleasure of liquor
C、recklessly endangered their communities
D、were respectful of the legal sanctions placed on them
答案
B
解析
事实细节题。第三段第二行“They were willing to take risks to get it”,即说明此点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2838691.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Everywherewelook,weseeAmericansrunning.Theyrunforev
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
【B1】[br]【B16】A、stimulatedB、fannedC、firedD、providedB空前的prevent和空后的fromspre
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
随机试题
AlotofpeoplemistakeJohnforBillbecausethey______eachotherinappearance
Thegirlknewtherewassomethingwrongwiththesentence,butshedidn’tknowh
[originaltext]M:Hello.W:Hello,Frank.ThisisSusan.I’msorrytophoneyou
Everysooften,lateatnight,DavidWoodlandstealsawaytothedenofhis
一圆形线圈半径为R,通以电流I,处在匀强磁场B中,且磁场方向与线圈平面平行,则载
采用洛氏硬度计检测锚具硬度时,相邻面压痕中心间距离至少应为压痕平均直径的(),
下列关于暂列金额说法正确的有( )。A.招标人在工程量清单中暂定并包括在合同价
2017年我国成年国民图书阅读率为59.1%,比上年增加0.3个百分点;报纸阅读
以下是关于对立统一规律在运动发展中的作用的一组材料: 材料1 “不塞不流,不
附加的工人效应体现了()特点。A.劳动力供给的经济周期 B.劳动力供给的生命
最新回复
(
0
)