首页
登录
职称英语
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts(催化剂
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts(催化剂
游客
2023-07-07
71
管理
问题
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts(催化剂), helping their owners forge intimate, long-term relationships with other people. But does that apply to the workplace? Christopher Honts and his colleagues at Central Michigan University were surprised to find that there was not much research on this question, and decided to put that right. They wondered in particular if the mere presence of a dog in the office-might make people collaborate more effectively. And. they found that it could.
To reach this conclusion, they carried out two experiments. In the first, they brought together 12 groups of four individuals and told each group to come up with a 15-second advertisement for a made-up product.
Everyone was asked to contribute ideas for the ad, but ultimately the group had to decide on only one. Some of the groups had a dog underfoot throughout, while the others had none. After the task, all the volunteers had to answer a questionnaire on how they felt about working with the other human members of the team. Mr. Honts found that those who had had a dog ranked their teammates more highly on measures of trust, team cohesion and intimacy than those who had not.
In the other experiment, the researchers explored how the presence of an animal altered players’ behaviour in a game known as the prisoner’s dilemma. In this game played by the volunteers, all four members of each group had been "charged" with a crime. Individually, they could choose(without being able to talk to the others)either to snitch(告发)on their teammates or to stand by them. Each individual’s decision affected the outcomes for the other three as well as for himself in a way that was explained in advance. The lightest sentence would be given to someone who chose to snitch while the other three did not; the heaviest penalty would be borne by a lone non-snitch. The second-best outcome came when all four decided not to snitch. And so on. Having a dog around made volunteers 30% less likely to snitch than those who played without one. The moral. then: more dogs in offices and fewer in police stations. [br] What does the phrase "to put that right"(Line 4, Para. 1)mean in the passage?
选项
A、To put something in the right place.
B、To offer a definite explanation.
C、To explain a phenomenon.
D、To preserve something.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2817215.html
相关试题推荐
______(青少年犯罪的主要原因是)thatsocialenvironmentisbecomingworse.Themainreasonwhy
Apaper,Anatomy(剖析)ofaLargeScaleSocialSearchEngine,layingoutastra
Apaper,Anatomy(剖析)ofaLargeScaleSocialSearchEngine,layingoutastra
Apaper,Anatomy(剖析)ofaLargeScaleSocialSearchEngine,layingoutastra
Apaper,Anatomy(剖析)ofaLargeScaleSocialSearchEngine,layingoutastra
Apaper,Anatomy(剖析)ofaLargeScaleSocialSearchEngine,layingoutastra
Apaper,Anatomy(剖析)ofaLargeScaleSocialSearchEngine,layingoutastra
Thereareplentyofstudieswhichshowthatdogsactassocialcatalysts(催化剂
Thereareplentyofstudieswhichshowthatdogsactassocialcatalysts(催化剂
Thereareplentyofstudieswhichshowthatdogsactassocialcatalysts(催化剂
随机试题
Iftheyhadinformedusinadvance,we______hereearlier.A、wouldcomeB、wouldha
【B1】[br]【B6】[audioFiles]audio_eufm_j01_259(200910)[/audioFiles]impression此处缺少
警惕:“弱势群体”利益在“最小化”,改革必须重视“利益”的走向问题,必须重视因改
关于肿瘤的发病因素的说法错误的是()A.吸烟与恶性肿瘤关系密切 B.恶性肿瘤
经脉循行联系上齿的为A.足少阴肾经 B.手阳明大肠经 C.足少阳胆经 D.
李某,男性,34岁。有慢性咳喘病史5年,外出感寒后,出现咳逆喘息。现症见:喘息咳
利用历年城市人口的年平均增长量数据,通过复利公式,计算预测期限可能达到的发展水平
下列哪个情形不属于可以直接判定为重大火灾隐患()。A.商店营业厅内的疏散距离超过
共用题干 男,58岁。上前牙反复肿痛4年,要求诊治。年轻时左上前牙有洞曾在医院
某厂房结构内靠近围护结构处的室内声级为90dB(A)(1000HZ),透声面积
最新回复
(
0
)