首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2023-07-02
43
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with_____.
选项
A、criticism
B、consent
C、indifference
D、expectation
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。本题考查文章人物的观点。苏珊.阿斯贝的观点态度只能从第5段推断出,从这一段中的defended和record amount of funding可知她对教育部的拨款数是认同的。选项A和C都是贬义词,不可能表达她的观点;选项D虽是褒义词,但苏珊是在陈述已发生的事实,而不是发表对教育部的期望。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2801133.html
相关试题推荐
PatriciaPanianeverwantedtobeanationalpublicfigure.Allshewantedt
PatriciaPanianeverwantedtobeanationalpublicfigure.Allshewantedt
PatriciaPanianeverwantedtobeanationalpublicfigure.Allshewantedt
PatriciaPanianeverwantedtobeanationalpublicfigure.Allshewantedt
Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworld,andwemust
Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworld,andwemust
Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworld,andwemust
Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworld,andwemust
Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworld,andwemust
Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworld,andwemust
随机试题
Althoughthelecturehadalreadybeenonforfiveminutes,Istillwasnotable
Musicproducesprofoundandlastingchangesinthebrain.Schoolsshouldadd
HowtoSurviveaLayoffYou’velostyourjob,butit
[originaltext]M:Hello,canIhelpyou?W:Hello!IwaswonderingifProfessor
男性,28岁,O型血,患再生障碍性贫血半年,血红蛋白70g/L,白细胞2.2×1
科技伦理学的规范性研究的常见研究思路有( )。A.直接从结果论的基本立场判断科
关于两化融合,以下说法错误的是()。A.是指信息化与制造业发展战略的融合。
组建团队是指获得人力资源的过程,项目管理团队应确保所选择的人力资源可以达到项目的
高危葡萄胎不包括A.卵巢黄素化囊肿大于6cm B.重复葡萄胎 C.子宫明显大
某建筑公司在对一办公大楼实行定向爆破拆除时,由于设计不合理,爆破时造成附近建筑堆
最新回复
(
0
)