首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2023-07-01
73
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] According to Tom Fagan, ____.
选项
A、the government has done its best to finance the poor children
B、the goals of No Child Left Behind Act are difficult to realize
C、the way of measuring progress by annual tests should be changed
D、the Bush government shouldn’t have approved the Title I program
答案
B
解析
本题考查对复合句的理解。由文中第6段第1句中的harder...to meet...可知B正确。C最具干扰性,要排除这个干扰,关键是要理解第6段第1句中由which引导的非限制性定语从句的作用。这个从句是对前面“the Bush administration’s signature education program”的附加事实信息,不属于汤姆·法甘的看法。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2798555.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworl
[originaltext]Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworl
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Youtalkedaboutevolution.Youtalkedaboutgenes.Andthere’
On21st-centurycampuses,isthereroomstillfortraditionalliteraturesuc
[originaltext]M:Helen,canIhavealookatyournewspaper?W:Sure,goahead.
[originaltext]Itiswhatfaileddietershavelongsuspected:Fatpeoplereally
跃廊式住宅的安全疏散距离,应按如下规则中的()计算。Ⅰ、应从户门算起;Ⅱ
下列有关法律推理的说法中,哪些说法是正确的?()《》()A.演绎推理是从个别
男性,20岁。上腹痛6个月就诊。与饮食无明显关系,吐酸水,常腹泻,曾有黑粪2次,
期货公司任用境外人士担任经理层人员职务的比例不得超过公司经理层人员总数的30%。
某分部工程有3个施工过程,各分为3个施工段组织加快的成倍节拍流水施工,各施工过程
女孩,7岁,高热12小时,伴有头痛、关节痛、呕吐。体检:表情呆钝,面色青灰,全身
最新回复
(
0
)