首页
登录
职称英语
The academics, at Miami University of Ohio, fill in questionnaires anonymous
The academics, at Miami University of Ohio, fill in questionnaires anonymous
游客
2023-06-30
37
管理
问题
The academics, at Miami University of Ohio, fill in questionnaires anonymously, evaluating their bosses’ effectiveness, with room to add more detailed remarks at the end. These comments are summarised and returned to all academic staff in the department, who agree whether the summary is fair, and the evaluation is then used not only to inform individual chairs about what sort of job they are doing, but also whether a pay rise or promotion should be in the offing.
This kind of evaluation is relatively common in American universities. But U. K. universities have always been much warier about the idea.
Now union members at the University of Sussex want this to change, proposing that all academic staff should be given the chance to appraise their heads of school. They argue that with students increasingly asked to assess the effectiveness of the teaching they receive, academics should also be able to comment on the effectiveness of university management.
A proposal to introduce upward appraisal was put to the university last term, but was rejected by managers. The union then conducted its own survey of academic and academic-related staff, but managers said this was unauthorized, flawed and represented a breach of trust and mutual confidence on the part of the union. The 300 responses had to be torn up.
Upward appraisal is not entirely unknown in U. K. universities. In 1996, Gillian Evans and Kevin Moloney produced a report on the practice for the Council for Academic Freedom and Standards, which found that eight of the 41 U. K. institutions who replied to a survey used it in some form, although usually informally. The report urged more institutions to adopt it, arguing that staff were increasingly subject to appraisal from above and that equitable treatment of staff is important and can only result in efficiency gains.
Little has changed since the report was published, with upward appraisal in U. K. universities remaining rare, although some institutions do use 360-degree feedback—feedback by selected peers, subordinates and seniors—as a management development tool. This is done at Warwick University, which strongly insists that it is "feedback", not "appraisal", and is voluntary, confidential and "not linked to appraisal or remuneration in any way".
Daniel Kane, a teacher in English and American literature at Sussex says: "We’re expected to act on what students say. And we do. We are simply asking for the same rights and same respect that our students have. But we aren’t being given the basic dignity of being able to say what works and what doesn’t. What are they afraid of?"
Evans says academics feel increasingly powerless—exposed both to what students think of them, through Facebook and other sites, and to the pressures on managers to reduce staff costs. "Appraisal has moved from being equal-to-equal to top-down," she says. "It has moved from being a friendly discussion about what one wants to do with one’s career to obligations to do something. There has also been a shift from relative job security to more short-term contracts. "
Nick Holley, head of the human resources centre at Henley Business School, University of Reading, says it can be useful for managers to see how others see them, but warns that this kind of feedback has to be conducted carefully. Scoring managers for different qualities is not only inexact, as some people mark more highly than others, but could tempt people to see management capability in terms of numbers rather than taking account of its complexity. [br] "360-degree feedback" in this passage probably refers to________.
选项
A、an overall evaluation of managers conducted by all academics
B、feedback from managers on the effectiveness of all staff
C、assessment pre-arranged by managers
D、upward appraisal
答案
C
解析
同义互换题。根据题干关键词360-degree feedback可将答案定位在第六段“…feedback by selected peers,subordinates and seniors——as a management development tool.”表示这个反馈是由管理者预先选好的人进行的评估,因此选项C正确。A和D与原文的意思相反,选项B对评价方向陈述错误。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2795511.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]USdoctorsfromDukeUniversitywarnthatrelyingonstandard
[originaltext]USdoctorsfromDukeUniversitywarnthatrelyingonstandard
ScoresofuniversityhallsofresidencesandlecturetheatresintheUKwere
ScoresofuniversityhallsofresidencesandlecturetheatresintheUKwere
ScoresofuniversityhallsofresidencesandlecturetheatresintheUKwere
[originaltext]UniversityofHouston’associateprofessorTempleNorthuphas
2013年10月30日,中国第一所网络文学大学(onlineliteratureuniversity)成立。诺贝尔文学奖得主(NobelLiter
AdetailedandthoroughresearchprojectundertakenbytheOpenUniversityr
AdetailedandthoroughresearchprojectundertakenbytheOpenUniversityr
AdetailedandthoroughresearchprojectundertakenbytheOpenUniversityr
随机试题
Whatdidalotofpeopletrytodolastyear?[br]Whatdoestheredwaxsealin
简述构建和完善农业社会化服务体系的重要意义。
本题主要考查导数的运算。 本题是含有参数的求导运算,求质点在时刻t=1的速度的大小,即求y对x的导数,在t=1处的值。
根据运作方式的不同,可以将基金分为()。 ①封闭式基金 ②开放式基金 ③
阻断M受体的药物是A.哌仑西平 B.酚妥拉明 C.阿替洛尔 D.美卡拉明
现在是9时整点,经过多少分钟,时针与分针第一次的夹角是180度?()A.
环境影响报告书经(),计划部门方可批准建设项目设计任务书。 A批准前 B
“三军可夺帅,匹夫不可夺志”说的是()。 A.道德认识B.道德情感 C.
关于公共物品的说法,正确的是()。A.一个人不进行购买就不能消费该物品 B
某工程施工有两个技术方案可供选择,甲方案需投资180万元,年生产成本为45万元;
最新回复
(
0
)