首页
登录
职称英语
Big is Back A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now t
Big is Back A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now t
游客
2023-06-29
32
管理
问题
Big is Back
A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now they have the advantage again. In 1996, in one of his most celebrated phrases, Bill Clinton declared that "the era of big government is over". He might have added that the era of big companies was over, too. The organisation that defined capitalism for much of the 20th century was then in retreat, attacked by corporate raiders, annoyed by shareholders and outwitted by entrepreneurs (企业家). Great names such as Pan Am had disappeared. Others had survived only by huge bloodletting: IBM sacked 122,000 people, a quarter of its workforce, between 1990 and 1995. Everyone agreed that the future lay with entrepreneurial start-ups such as Yahoo! —which in late 1998 had the same market capitalisation with 637 employees as Boeing with 230,000. The share of GDP produced by big industrial companies fell by half between 1974 and 1998, from 36% to 17%.
B) Today the balance of advantage may be shifting again. To a degree, the financial crisis is responsible. It has destroyed the venture-capital market, the lifeblood of many young firms. Governments have been rescuing companies they consider too big to fail, such as Citigroup and General Motors. Recession is squeezing out smaller and less well-connected firms. But there are other reasons too, which are giving big companies a self-confidence they have not displayed for decades.
C) Of course, big companies never went away. There were still plenty of first-rate ones: Unilever and Toyota continued to innovate through thick and thin. And not all start-ups were models of success: Netscape and Enron promised to revolutionise their industries only to crash and burn. Nevertheless, the balance had shifted in favour of small organisations. The entrepreneurial boom was supercharged by two developments. Deregulation (撤销管制规定) opened protected markets. Some national champions, such as AT&T, were broken up. Others saw their markets eaten up by swift-footed newcomers. The arrival of the personal computer in the 1970s and the internet in the 1990s created an army of successful start-ups. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak founded Apple Computer in 1976 in the Jobs family’s garage. Microsoft and Dell Computer were both founded by teenagers (in 1975 and 1984 respectively). Larry Page and Sergey Brin started Google in Stanford dorm rooms.
D) But deregulation had already begun to go out of fashion before the financial crisis. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, introduced after Enron collapsed in disgrace, increased the regulatory burden on companies of all sizes, but what could be borne by the big could cripple the small. Many of today’s most dynamic industries are much more friendly to big companies than the IT industry. Research in biotechnology is costly and often does not bear fruit for years. Natural-resource companies, whose importance grows as competition for resources intensifies, need to be big—hence the mining industry’s consolidation.
E) Two further developments are shifting the balance of advantage in favour of size. One is a heightened awareness of the risks of subcontracting (转包合同). Toy companies and pet-food firms alike have found that their brands can be hurt if their suppliers turn out goods of poor quality. Big industrial companies have learned that their production cycles can be broken up if contractors are not up to the mark. Boeing, once a champion of subcontracting, has been forced to take over slow suppliers. A second is the emergence of companies that have discovered how to be entrepreneurial as well as big. These giants are getting better at minimising the costs of size (such as longer, more complex chains of managerial command) while exploiting its advantages (such as presence in several markets and access to a large talent pool). Cisco Systems is pioneering the use of its own video technology to improve communications between its employees. IBM has carried out several company-wide brainstorming exercises, recently involving more than 150,000 people, that have encouraged it to put more emphasis, for example, on green computing. Disney has successfully taken Pixar’s creative magic.
F) You might suppose that the return of the mighty, now better equipped to crush the competition, is something to worry about. Not necessarily. Big is not always ugly just as small is not always beautiful. Most entrepreneurs dream of turning their start-ups into giants (or at least of selling them to giants for a fortune). There is a symbiosis (互利合作关系) between large and small. "Cloud computing" would not provide young firms with access to huge amounts of computer power if big companies had not created giant servers. Biotech start-ups would go bust were they not given work by giants with deep pockets.
G) The most successful economic ecosystems contain a variety of big and small companies: Silicon Valley boasts long-established names as well as an ever-changing array of start-ups. America’s economy has been more dynamic than Europe’s in recent decades not just because it is better at giving birth to companies but also because it is better at letting them grow. Only 5% of European Union companies born since 1980 have made it into the list of the 1,000 biggest in the EU by market capitalisation. In America, the figure is 22%.
H) The return of the giants could well be a blessing for the world economy—but only if business people and policymakers avoid certain mistakes. Businesses should not admire size blindly, particularly if this means diversifying into a lot of unrelated areas. The model of joint business may be tempting when cash is hard to find. But the moment will not last. By and large, the most successful big firms focus on their core businesses.
I) Policymakers should both resist an instinctive suspicion of big companies and avoid the old error of embracing national champions. It is bad enough that governments have diverted resources into supporting failing companies such as General Motors. It would be even more regrettable if they were to return to picking winners. The best use of their energies is to remove the burdens and barriers which prevent entrepreneurs from starting businesses and turning small companies into big ones. [br] Boeing realized that subcontracting could threaten its production cycle.
选项
答案
E
解析
根据专有名词Boeing及难词subcontracting可定位至E段第4、5句。第5句提到的Boeing是为了说明上一句提到的承包商达不到标准对一些公司的影响,本题的threaten its production cycle与原文的their production cycles can be broken up意思相近,故E为本题出处。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2792122.html
相关试题推荐
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
随机试题
SocialAging:ABillionShadesofGreyA)WarrenBuff
突出创新驱动,补齐技术短板。针对公司研发力量不强、研发结果转化利用不足、专利技术
下列哪项不属于血管壁的止血功能A.促凝物质释放反应 B.局部血液黏度下降 C
某公司安排已满16周岁的未成年人从事高强度危险工作,由文化和旅游、人力资源和社会
共用题干 WanttoBe100?ListentoThese5
根据《中华人民共和国环境影响评价法》,规划环境影响评价范围包括下列哪些项?(
为了降低货物招标采购的风险,招标人可以采取的合理措施有()。A、严格审查投标人的
徐某被何某侮辱后一直寻机报复,某日携带尖刀到何某住所将其刺成重伤。经司法鉴定,徐
关于室内给水管道施工技术要求的说法,错误的是()。A.管道绝热按其用途可分为保
下列费用中,属于建筑安装工程措施费的有()。A.社会保障费 B.环境保护费
最新回复
(
0
)