Cutting toxic levels of city air pollution to safer levels is simple, but no

游客2023-06-28  43

问题     Cutting toxic levels of city air pollution to safer levels is simple, but not easy—it requires resolve. Yet, despite the key culprit (罪犯) in the UK being well known—diesel (柴油机的) vehicles—the government has been asleep at the wheel for years.
    Levels of nitrogen dioxide (二氧化氮) have been illegally high across much of the UK since 2010. In 2015 86% of major urban areas broke annual limits. Cutting this pollution means choking off diesel emissions and there is a wide range of effective measures available.
    Creating zones in city centres where polluting cars are either banned or charged is important, while making cities safe for cycling and walking cuts traffic too.
    Cleaner buses and taxis have an important role to play and change to the perverse taxes that encourage people to buy diesel over cleaner cars is needed. There is also some support for a revival of a scrappage scheme which saw dirty old bangers taken off the road.
    The environment and transport departments were well aware of all this and proposed many of these measures internally, only for the Treasury to reject most of them, arguing they "would be politically very difficult, especially given the impacts on motorists".
    Motorists happen to be particularly badly exposed to air pollution, but the real political difficulty for the government is two humiliating legal defeats in two years where judges ruled its air pollution plans were so bad they were illegal.
    Ministers have now been forced to come up with a third plan, but clean air zones and car tax changes take time to clean up the air. Yet the UK government is also in the slow lane when it comes to emergency measures.
    When foul air descended on Paris in December, officials there swung into action. Public transport was made free and the number of cars allowed on roads was restricted, alternately barring those with odd and even licence plates. In the UK, during the same December smog, the government sent a few tweets.
    At the root of the problem are diesel cars, which successive governments across Europe have utterly failed to ensure meet legal emissions limits when driving in real-world conditions on the road. The gaming of regulatory tests by carmakers was blown open by the Volkswagen scandal. The scandal of governments prioritising supposed driver freedom over the lungs and health of their citizens is only now playing out. [br] Which of the following measures did the French government take when smog suddenly arrived in December?

选项 A、Establishing clean air zones.
B、Reforming car taxes.
C、Limiting vehicles based on license plate number.
D、Posting several announcements on Twitter.

答案 C

解析 事实细节题。定位句指出,当12月份雾霾突然袭击巴黎时,当地官员立即采取了行动,免费使用公共交通设施,限制上路汽车的数量,根据车牌的单双号交替限行。由此推断,法国政府采取的措施之一是根据车牌号对汽车限行,故答案为C)。A)“建立清洁空气区”和B)“改革汽车税收”,这两项措施是针对英国政府而言,并未提及法国政府是否采取了相同措施,故均排除;D)“在推特上发表几篇声明”,第八段第三句提到这是英国政府在同一月的雾霾期间所采取的措施,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2790088.html
最新回复(0)