首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2023-06-25
69
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with_____.
选项
A、criticism
B、consent
C、indifference
D、expectation
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。本题考查文章人物的观点。苏珊.阿斯贝的观点态度只能从第5段推断出,从这一段中的defended和record amount of funding可知她对教育部的拨款数是认同的。选项A和C都是贬义词,不可能表达她的观点;选项D虽是褒义词,但苏珊是在陈述已发生的事实,而不是发表对教育部的期望。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2780472.html
相关试题推荐
Bilingual(双语的)educationinschoolshaslongbeenapoliticalhotpotato—itwa
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpeo
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpeo
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpeo
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpeo
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpeo
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpeo
[originaltext]Houstonhasreceivedover120centimetersofraininjustaf
[originaltext]Houstonhasreceivedover120centimetersofraininjustaf
[originaltext]AbigdifferencebetweenpublicandprivateinAmericanhighe
随机试题
Whenclimbingthehill,Johnwasknockedunconsciousbyan______rollingstone.
PASSAGETHREE[br]Whatdoestheterm"suchchurn"referto?Newinnovativetechn
扩张性的财政政策与紧缩性的财政政策如何调整经济周期。
起重吊装“十不吊”规定不包括()。A.风力4级以上不准吊 B.起重臂和吊起的
下列不属于资产项目的是( )。A.货币资金 B.应收票据 C.无形资产
医院健康教育的目的是A.防治疾病,促进身心康复 B.提高患者依从性 C.密切
课程资源的特点有() A.多样性B.潜在性 C.多质性D.动
西瓜霜的作用是A.降低毒性 B.缓和药性 C.增强清热泻火 D.增强清热化
安全生产监督管理的方式大体可以分为事前、事中和事后三种。事中监督管理重点在作业场
(2019年真题)关于表见代理的说法,正确的是()A.表见代理属于无权代理,对本
最新回复
(
0
)