2. 职称英语
  3. Martha Stewart was charged, tried and convicted of a crime in 2004. As she n

Martha Stewart was charged, tried and convicted of a crime in 2004. As she n

游客2023-06-22  11
问题     Martha Stewart was charged, tried and convicted of a crime in 2004. As she neared the end of her prison sentence, a well-known columnist wrote that she was " paying her dues," and that " there is simply no reason for anyone to attempt to deny her right to start anew. "
    Surely, the American ideal of second chances should not be reserved only for the rich and powerful. Unfortunately, many federal and state laws impose post-conviction restrictions on a shockingly large number of Americans, who are prevented from ever fully paying their debt to society.
    At least 65 million people in the United States have a criminal record. This can result in severe penalties that continue long after punishment is completed.
    Many of these penalties are imposed regardless of the seriousness of the offense or the person’s individual circumstances. Laws can restrict or ban voting, access to public housing, and professional and business licensing. They can affect a person’s ability to get a job and qualification for benefits.
    In all, more than 45,000 laws and rules serve to exclude vast numbers of people from fully participating in American life.
    Some laws make sense. No one advocates letting someone convicted of pedophilia(恋童癖)work in a school. But too often collateral(附随的)consequences bear no relation to public safety. Should a woman who possessed a small amount of drugs years ago be permanently unable to be licensed as a nurse?
    These laws are also counterproductive, since they make it harder for people with criminal records to find housing or land a job, two key factors that reduce backsliding.
    A recent report makes several recommendations, including the abolition of most post-conviction penalties, except for those specifically needed to protect public safety. Where the penalties are not a must, they should be imposed only if the facts of a case support it.
    The point is not to excuse or forget the crime. Rather, it is to recognize that in America’s vast criminal justice system, second chances are crucial. It is in no one’s interest to keep a large segment of the population on the margins of society. [br] What do we learn from the second paragraph about many criminals in America?
选项 A、They backslide after serving their terms in prison.
B、They are deprived of chances to turn over a new leaf.
C、They receive severe penalties for committing minor offenses.
D、They are convicted regardless of their individual circumstances.
答案 B
解析 推理判断题。文章第二段第二句指出，很多联邦法律和州立法律对很大一部分美国人强制实施定罪后限制，使他们不能够再次充分地回报社会。由此可知，一些服刑人员即使刑满释放，也会受到法律的限制，难以完全融人社会，开始新的人生，故答案为B)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2772414.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)