2. 职称英语
  3. Thinking small, being engaging, and having a sense of humor don’t hurt. Those

Thinking small, being engaging, and having a sense of humor don’t hurt. Those

游客2023-06-22  18
问题    Thinking small, being engaging, and having a sense of humor don’t hurt. Those are a few of the traits of successful science crowdfunding efforts that emerge from a recent study that examined nearly 400 campaigns. But having a large network and some promotional skills may be more crucial.
   Crowdfunding, raising money for a project through online appeals, has taken off in recent years for everything from making movies to producing water-saving gadgets. Scientists have tried to tap Internet donors, too, with mixed success. Some raised more than twice their goals, but others have fallen short of reaching even modest targets.
   To determine what separates science crowdfunding triumphs from failures, a team led by science communications scholar Mike Schafer of the University of Zurich examined the content of the webpages for 371 recent campaigns.
   Four traits stood out for those that achieved their goals, the researchers report in Public Understanding of Science. For one, they use a crowdfunding platform that specializes in raising money for science, and not just any kind of project. Although sites like Kickstarter take all comers, platforms such as Experiment, com and Petridish. org only present scientific projects. For another, they present the project with a funny video because good visuals and a sense of humor improved success. Most of them engage with potential donors, since projects that answered questions from interested donors fared better. And they target a small amount of money. The projects included in the study raised $ 4,000 on average, with 30% receiving less than $ 1,000. The more money a project sought, the lower the chance it reached its goal, the researchers found.
   Other factors may also significantly influence a project’s success, most notably, the size of a scientist’s personal and professional networks, and how much a researcher promotes a project on their own. Those two factors are by far more critical than the content on the page. Crowdfunding can be part of researchers’ efforts to reach the public, and people give because "they feel a connection to the person" who is doing the fundraising—not necessarily to the science. [br] What do we learn about the scientists trying to raise money online for their projects?
选项 A、They did not raise much due to modest targets.
B、They made use of mixed fundraising strategies.
C、Not all of them achieved their anticipated goals.
D、Most of them put movies online for the purpose.
答案 C
解析 细节辨认题。定位句指出，科学家们也曾尝试利用互联网捐助者，但成败参半。有些筹到的资金比目标多了一倍多，但有些却连小的目标都没达到。由此可见，并非所有的科学家都成功地筹集到了资金，故答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2772383.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)