首页
登录
职称英语
Picture this: You’re at a movie theater food stand loading up on snacks. You
Picture this: You’re at a movie theater food stand loading up on snacks. You
游客
2023-06-22
24
管理
问题
Picture this: You’re at a movie theater food stand loading up on snacks. You have a choice of a small, medium or large soda. The small is $ 3.50 and the large is $ 5.50. It’s a tough decision: The small size may not last you through the whole movie, but $ 5.50 for some sugary drink seems ridiculous. But there’s a third option, a medium soda for $ 5.25. Medium may be the perfect amount of soda for you, but the large is only a quarter more. If you’re like most people, you end up buying the large (and taking a bathroom break midshow).
If you’re wondering who would buy the medium soda, the answer is almost no one. In fact, there’s a good chance the marketing department purposely priced the medium soda as a decoy (诱饵), making you more likely to buy the large soda rather than the small.
I have written about this peculiarity in human nature before with my friend Dan Ariely, who studied this phenomenon extensively after noticing pricing for subscriptions (订阅) to The Economist. The digital subscription was $ 59, the print subscription was $ 125, and the print plus digital subscription was also $ 125. No one in their right mind would buy the print subscription when you could get digital as well for the same price, so why was it even an option? Ariely ran an experiment and found that when only the two "real" choices were offered, more people chose the less-expensive digital subscription. But the addition of the bad option made people much more likely to choose the more expensive print plus digital option.
Brain scientists call this effect "asymmetric dominance" and it means that people gravitate toward the choice nearest a clearly inferior option. Marketing professors call it the decoy effect, which is certainly easier to remember. Lucky for consumers, almost no one in the business community understands it.
The decoy effect works because of the way our brains assign value when making choices. Value is almost never absolute; rather, we decide an object’s value relative to our other choices. If more options are introduced, the value equation changes. [br] How do we assess the value of a commodity, according to the passage?
选项
A、By considering its usefulness.
B、By comparing it with other choices.
C、By taking its quality into account.
D、By examining its value equation.
答案
B
解析
细节辨认题。定位句指出,价值几乎从来不是绝对的;相反,我们是相对于其他选择来确定某一物品的价值。如果引入更多选项,则价值等式将发生变化。由此可知,我们是通过比较不同的选择来评估某一商品的价值,故答案为B)“通过与其他选择进行比较”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2772275.html
相关试题推荐
Mostofushaveformedanunrealisticpictureoflifeonadesertisland.We
Mostofushaveformedanunrealisticpictureoflifeonadesertisland.We
Mostofushaveformedanunrealisticpictureoflifeonadesertisland.We
Mostofushaveformedanunrealisticpictureoflifeonadesertisland.We
Mostofushaveformedanunrealisticpictureoflifeonadesertisland.We
Hometheatersystemsarerevolutionizingthemoviescenebyhelpingconsumer
Hometheatersystemsarerevolutionizingthemoviescenebyhelpingconsumer
Hometheatersystemsarerevolutionizingthemoviescenebyhelpingconsumer
Hometheatersystemsarerevolutionizingthemoviescenebyhelpingconsumer
Hometheatersystemsarerevolutionizingthemoviescenebyhelpingconsumer
随机试题
Foetalsleeperstendtobeshyandsensitive,butpeoplewhoassumethesoldier
监管supervision
Thetrapezeartistwhoranawaywiththeclownbrokeuptheliontamer’sheart.A
[originaltext]M:Whydoyouthinkthatway?W:WhileIadmitthereisverylitt
给某患者静脉注射20%葡萄糖50ml,患者尿量显著增加,尿糖定性阳性。分析该患者
功能泻肺平喘,利水消肿的药组是A桑白皮、葶苈子 B马兜铃、枇杷叶 C百部、紫
时间分辨荧光免疫法测定内皮细胞、淋巴细胞等细胞表面的粘附分子,下述说法错误的是A
天王补心丹治疗失眠重者,加下列哪味药A.龙骨 B.磁石 C.牡蛎 D.代赭
临床上常用简便的能量代谢测定法,通常只测定A.食物的营养学热价 B.食物的氧热
某建筑公司为某开发区铺设通信线路,工程价款共计290万元,其中包含由开发区提供的
最新回复
(
0
)