首页
登录
从业资格
Canelectricity cause cancer?In a society
Canelectricity cause cancer?In a society
资格题库
2022-08-02
34
问题
Canelectricity cause cancer?In a society that literally runs on electric power,the very idea seems preposterous.But for more than a decade,a growing band ofscientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure toelectromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies.The implications are unsettling,to say the least,since everyone comes intocontact with such fields,which are generated by everything electrical,frompower lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens.Becauseevidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory,it has beenhard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity islegitimate——or the worst kind of paranoia.Now thealarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S.EnvironmentalProtection Agency.In the executive summary of a new scientific review,released in draft form late last week,the EPA has put forward what amounts tothe most serious government warning to date.The agency tentatively concludesthat scientific evidence“suggests a casual link”between extremely low-frequencyelectromagnetic fields--those having very long wave-lengths--and leukemia,lymphoma and brain cancer,while the report falls short of classifying ELFfields as probable carcinogens,it does identify the common 60-hertz magneticfield as“a possible,but not proven,cause of cancer in humans”.The report is no reason topanic--or even to lost sleep.If there is a cancer risk,it is a small one.Theevidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal ofdebate within the Administration,and the EPA released it over strongobjections from the Pentagon and the White House.But now no one can deny thatthe issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.At theheart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon:Whenan electric current passes through a wire,it generates an electromagneticfield that exerts forces on surrounding objects.For many years,scientistsdismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful,primarily becausethey are so extraordinarily weak.The ELF magnetic field generated by a videoterminal measures only a few milligauss,or about one-hundredth the strength ofthe earth'sownmagnetic field,the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as10 kilovolts per meter,but the corresponding field induced in human cells willbe only about 1 millivolt per meter.This is far less than the electric fieldsthat the cells themselves generate.Howcould such minuscule forces pose a health danger?The consensus used to be thatthey could not,and for decades,scientists concentrated on more powerful kindsof radiation,like X-rays,that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons outof the molecules that make up the human body.Such“ionizing”radiations havebeen clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations tocontrol emissions.Butepidemiological studies,which find statistical associations between sets ofdata,do not prove cause and effect.Though there is a body of laboratory workshowing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animaltissues,a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths hasnever been found.ThePentagon is far from persuaded.In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPAreport,Air Force scientists charge its authors with having“biased the entiredocument”toward proving a link.“Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer,”the Air Force concludes.“It is astonishing that the EPA would lendits imprimatur on this report.”Then Pentagon's concern is understandable.There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavyuse of some kind of electronic equipment,from huge ground-based radar towersto the defense systems built into every warship and plane.Theviewpoint of the EPA is_______.查看材料A.thereis casual link between electricity and cancerB.electricity really affects cancerC.controversialD.lowfrequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
选项
A.thereis casual link between electricity and cancer
B.electricity really affects cancer
C.controversial
D.lowfrequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
细节题。根据关键词定位至原文第二段。根据“The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence‘suggestsa casual link’between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields--thosehaving very longwave.1engths—and leukemia,lymphoma and brain cancer…”可知,美国环保署认为电流与癌症之间有着某种难以确定的关系。故本题选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/congyezige/1881141.html
本试题收录于:
中学英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格笔试分类
中学英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格笔试
相关试题推荐
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasociety
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasociety
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasociety
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasociety
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasociety
Usually,societyisfarmorededicatedto
Muchofthedebateonanongoingsociety
Muchofthedebateonanongoingsociety
Muchofthedebateonanongoingsociety
随机试题
在电炉上安装了4个温控器,其显示温度的误差是随机的.在使用过程中,只要有两个温控
患儿,男性,11岁。在一次考试中突然将手中钢笔掉在地上,两眼向前瞪视,呼之不应,
下列哪项是上消化道大出血的临床表现A.失血性周围循环衰竭 B.呕血黑便 C.
下列避孕措施中同时有防止性传播作用的是A、活性宫内节育器 B、紧急避孕药物
1998年6月末,某商业银行的核心资本为69165万元,附属资本为2237万元,
A.行气利湿 B.分清化浊 C.清热利水 D.利湿行水 E.除湿祛痰五苓
妊娠期高血压宜选用的药品是A.福辛普利 B.利血平 C.厄贝沙坦 D.阿利
(2013年真题)根据《民法典·合同编》,下列合同中,属于可变更、可撤销合同的有
《国家建筑标准设计图集》(16G101)平法施工图中,剪力墙上柱的标注代号为(
链霉素的主要不良反应是( )。A.眼毒性 B.肾毒性 C.再生障碍性贫血
最新回复
(
0
)