首页
登录
从业资格
Passage 2 Scientists have been surprise
Passage 2 Scientists have been surprise
免费题库
2022-08-02
61
问题
Passage 2Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture--the language we speak, the values weabsorb--shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To takeone recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedlyrepresents the self: it is active when we ( "we" being the Americans in the study) think of our ownidentity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me"circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, butalso when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no suchoverlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self asautonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes onquite different functions."Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Someof the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences.For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians payattention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split).Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americansrecruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that processfigure-ground relations--holistic context--while the Americans showed more activity in regions thatrecognize objects.Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showeddrawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (armscrossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain′s dopamine-fueled reward circuitbecame most active at the sight of the stance--dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese--that each volunteer′s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obviouschicken-and-egg question, but the smart money is on culture shaping the brain, not vice versa.Cultural neuroscience wouldn′t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only forwell-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 studyfound that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4)or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabicnumerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and planmovements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use languagecircuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them withsymbolic, spatial freight. (Insert cliche about Asian math geniuses.) "One would think that neuralprocesses involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seemto be culture-specific."Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it′ s important to ask whether neuroscience revealsanything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it′s well known thatEast Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.Does identifying brain correlates of those values offer any extra insight After all, it′s not as ifanyone thought those values are the result of something in the liver.Ambady thinks cultural neuro-science does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding,which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you incollectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push theanalysis to the level of the brain." Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differencesare--so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and thelike may be no such thing.Why does the author cite the findings of previous studies in Paragraph 3A.To introduce a new topic.B.To place a topic in a larger context.C.To discuss a solution to a certain problem.D.To provide empirical data to confirm a prior belief.
选项
A.To introduce a new topic.
B.To place a topic in a larger context.
C.To discuss a solution to a certain problem.
D.To provide empirical data to confirm a prior belief.
答案
D
解析
推断题。由第三段可知引用先前研究的结果是为了确认之前的看法是对的。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/congyezige/1879364.html
本试题收录于:
中学英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格笔试分类
中学英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格笔试
相关试题推荐
请阅读Passage2,完成小题: Passage2Americans
请阅读Passage1,完成小题。 Passage1Ofallthe
Itcanbeconcludedfromthepassagethat
Thepassagemustprobablyappearsin____
Accordingtothepassage,wecangetthat
Accordingtothepassage,Emersonislike
Passage1 Inatraditionalclassroom,
Passage1 Inatraditionalclassroom,
Passage1 Inatraditionalclassroom,
Passage2 FormostAmericankids,itwo
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Whendoesthemoviebegin?W:7:00p.m.anditlaststwohours
公路隧道通风控制系统,可以经计算处理监测隧道内的(),控制风机运转。A.能
与肝脏DSA检查技术无关的是A.采用Seldinger技术 B.导管插入肝门静
复层鳞状上皮内底层细胞的直径为A.8~10μm B.12~15μm C.15
治疗瘰疬痰核,应选用的药物是A.贯众 B.连翘 C.大青叶 D.板蓝根
微机防误软件的防误闭锁逻辑应符合()。(A)现场设备“五防”要求(B
隔离开关机构箱电缆孔洞封堵不严造成机构箱密封不良,凝露属于(____)缺陷(A)
结构材料可部分或全部回收利用的基坑围护结构有()A、地下连续墙 B、钢板桩
关于防眩设施施工安装要求的说法,正确的是()。A.防眩设施安装高度的允许偏差为
甲亢手术发生甲状腺危象的高危时间是A.术后48~72小时 B.术后12~36小
最新回复
(
0
)