首页
登录
职称英语
What was the court ruling as to Microsoft’s business practice? [br] How could th
What was the court ruling as to Microsoft’s business practice? [br] How could th
游客
2025-05-25
27
管理
问题
What was the court ruling as to Microsoft’s business practice? [br] How could the breakup potentially hurt the interest of consumers?
Anchor: Big news today, the Justice Department said they would ask the Federal judge to break up Microsoft. It was expected earlier this month when the judge in the government case against Microsoft ruled the company did break antitrust law by trying to use its monopoly in the market for computer operating systems to stifle competition. Here’s our correspondent Martin White on today’s development.
Martin White, correspondent: I heard the government planned that Microsoft would have to come up with the details of this breakup itself, how to divide its people, its-property, its cash into two still very powerful pieces.
To accomplish the breakup, Microsoft would have to sell of about half its assets to create two companies. One would control most of Microsoft software, including Word, Excel and Internet Explorer. The other company would consist mostly of Windows operating system. But only one can keep the name of Microsoft. The other company would become completely independent.
For the first 10 years, the two companies would not be allowed to recombine. And Microsoft’s top executives, including Bill Gates, could own stock of only one of them. The result, said Joel Klein, antitrust chief of the Justice Department, would be an exciting, and innovative set of new products with more choices and lower prices for America’s consumers.
17 of the 19 states that sued along with the government signed on to the plan, but two states, Ohio and Illinois, dissented, asking that Microsoft be left intact but ordered to change its anti-competitive behavior.
For Microsoft, the breakup plan was not a surprise. Today Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates promised a long court fight and predicted a victory. He said he didn’t believe the courts would uphold these radical regulatory suggestions which would hurt consumers and undermine the high technology economy.
Even if the court accepts the government’s breakup plan. Microsoft would remain intact as it appeals, and that would take years. But government also asks the court to impose immediate restrictions on the company’s business practice even as the court battle drags on.
Anchor: Thanks very much, Martin White in Washington. So the government has won the first battle to prove that’ Microsoft’s size and power are problem. But it’s not clear at all if breaking up the software colossal would make things any better for consumers. Here’s our correspondent, Susan Kelley.
Susan Kelley, correspondent: There’s no consensus today that breaking up Microsoft would be good for consumers. For one thing, they could end up paying more for Microsoft products. Two companies mean two of everything, including two manufacturing operations.
An industrial analyst: If you run two separate, distinct companies, you lose your economy of scale. That’s gonna increase cost for running the company that will ultimately be passed to consumer.
Susan Kelley: There’s also no agreement now on whether breaking up Microsoft would improve the quality of products available to consumers. Some said if Microsoft was forced to share its unique code that operates Windows, competitors would be able to make better products to go with Windows. What would it be, though, is a lot of companies deciding to write competitive products because they now think the playing field is level. Others claim that progress in bringing new products to market will slow if the Microsoft brain trust is split in two.
An industrial analyst: There’s a lot of cohesion that takes place by working as one solid entity rather than a separate distinct group of companies.
Susan Kelley: As for competitors eager for a breakup, they will still find themselves facing formidable foes. Microsoft is by far the Number One company. If you split it in two, it will be the Number One and Number Two software companies in the world.
Bottom line: Plenty of reasons to wonder if the government’s proposal to break up Microsoft would solve the problems it is designed to fix.
Anchor: Thank you, Susan. On Wall Street today, Microsoft stock was down slightly. It’s fallen nearly 25% since the judge’s ruling against it early this month.
选项
A、The breakup led to a setback: Windows 2000 won’t be shipped to consumers until February, two years behind schedule.
B、The pay-per-minute model of the cell phone industry will meld with the free culture of the Internet.
C、The breakup could increase the operating costs and thus make their products more expensive.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4089872.html
相关试题推荐
WhatwasthecourtrulingastoMicrosoft’sbusinesspractice?[br]Whywouldot
•Youwillhearfivespeakerstalkingaboutbusinesstrips.•Foreachrecording
•Youwillhearfivespeakerstalkingaboutbusinesstrips.•Foreachrecording
•Youwillhearfivespeakerstalkingaboutbusinesstrips.•Foreachrecording
•Youwillhearfivespeakerstalkingaboutbusinesstrips.•Foreachrecording
Paulthinkspotentialdangerofbusinessesis______.[br]Inthefuture,Hewant
Paulthinkspotentialdangerofbusinessesis______.[br]Abouthiswork,hefin
Paulthinkspotentialdangerofbusinessesis______.[br]Hisstafflikeworking
Paulthinkspotentialdangerofbusinessesis______.[br]Hisfirstcompanyfail
•YouwillhearPaultalkabouthowhesetuphisownbusinesstoadvisecompani
随机试题
AstudyfoundthattheradiationfromCTscans—thetestsregularlyusedto(1
Todayanyonewillacceptmoneyinexchangeforgoodsandservices.Peopleus
Nowadays,somethinghasgoneterriblywrongwithouronce-proudAmericanway
在下列何种酶的催化下,胆红素被转化为结合胆红素A.血红素加氧酶 B.葡萄糖醛酸
女性,55岁。患类风湿关节炎多年,长期服用阿司匹林,血红蛋白90g/L,平均红细
最能反映医患关系性质的表述是一种A.陌生人关系 B.信托关系 C.主动
A.阴阳说 B.水地说 C.五行说 D.元气说 E.云气说气的概念源自
属于阴离子型表面活性剂的是A.苯扎溴铵 B.吐温-80 C.司盘-80 D
临床上抗HIV病毒药齐多夫定是通过抑制核苷逆转录酶,抑制DNA链的增长。齐多夫定
增值税纳税人分为()。A.一般纳税人 B.小规模纳税人 C.股份公司纳税人
最新回复
(
0
)