首页
登录
职称英语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualit
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualit
游客
2025-05-11
21
管理
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study (working people’s diaries, we assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marit: status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the numbe location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting: occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at frist glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility coding over 200, 000 diary days. Because of the tabor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months - January and July - of each year a diarist kept diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor-intensive chores. July tended to be haying season for farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields - some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people - those who kept a diary for only a single year - the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary, year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24, 752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places; and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’s diary (9 July, 1825) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Carr’s for Oxen." (See Hansen and McDonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data.) We therefore created the following Coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded: as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place, Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend (which is an intimate affair), allowed us to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’s home, or interaction at a public place. [br] What was coded?
选项
A、writings about everyday life
B、a distinctive study
C、the months of January and July
D、the visitors the writer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4071380.html
相关试题推荐
Duringthe19thcentury,JewsinmostEuropeancountriesachievedsomeequality
IncomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesremainedrelativelystableforaperi
IncomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesremainedrelativelystableforaperi
IncomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesremainedrelativelystableforaperi
BuildingonthebaseofevidenceandinterpretationinHansen’s(1994)qualit
BuildingonthebaseofevidenceandinterpretationinHansen’s(1994)qualit
BuildingonthebaseofevidenceandinterpretationinHansen’s(1994)qualit
Thepoorqualityofsoundofthefilmminedthe______perfectproduct.A、rather
Tilechildis______alltheevidenceforhisopinion.A、notencourageeitherto
Theschemeforrebuildingthecitycenter______,owingtotherefusalofacoun
随机试题
______politicianswerekilledintheterroristattack.[originaltext]Armenia
Thesearedarkdaysforthebookbusiness.Borders,aonce-hugebookseller,(
HowmanykindsofdoctorsarethereintheUS?[br]WhatisveryimportanttoAm
UML所包括的图形中,( )将进程或其他计算结构展示为计算内部的控制流和数据流
在某地进行男性吸烟与膀胱癌关系的研究,资料如下:吸烟组膀胱癌发病率为48.0/1
4个月以内完全母乳喂养的婴儿,别的均不需添加,但必须补充A.钙 B.维生素A
阻波器构架倾斜,水平尺测量构架与地面大于3度,已造成导线紧绷,瓷瓶有可能出现
基础心理学是研究()。 (A)正常成人心理现象的心理学基础学科 (B
根据受力特点,桥梁可分为( )。A.梁式桥 B.拱式桥 C.预应力混凝土桥
隧道相向开挖时,在相同贯通里程的中线点空问存在不相重合,此两点在空间的连接误差名
最新回复
(
0
)