首页
登录
职称英语
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
游客
2025-05-07
11
管理
问题
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it; how it’s dying; how we’re headed for an even more wired, underregulated, overintrusive, privacy-deprived planet.
I should also point out that as news director for Pathfinder, Time Inc.’s mega info mall,and a guy who makes his living on the Web, I know better than most people that we’re hurtling toward an even more intrusive world. We’re all being watched by computers whenever we visit Websites; by the mere act of "browsing" (it sounds so passive!) we’re going public in a way that was unimaginable a decade ago. I know this because I’m a watcher too. When people come to my Website, without ever knowing their names, I can peer over their shoulders, recording what they look at, timing how long they stay on a particular page, following them around Pathfinder’s sprawling offerings.
None of this would bother me in the least, I suspect, if a few years ago, my phone, like Marley’s ghost, hadn’t given me a glimpse of the nightmares to come. On Thanksgiving weekend in 1995, someone (presumably a critic of a book my wife and I had just written about computer hackers) forwarded my home telephone number to an out-of-state answering machine, where unsuspecting callers trying to reach me heard a male voice identify himself as me and say some extremely rude things. Then, with typical hacker aplomb, the prankster asked people to leave their messages (which to my surprise many callers, including my mother, did). This went on for several days until my wife and I figured out that something was wrong ("Hey...why hasn’t the phone rung since Wednesday?") and got our phone service restored.
It seemed funny at first, and it gave us a swell story to tell on our book tour. But the interloper who seized our telephone line continued to hit us even after the tour ended. And hit us again and again for the next six months. The phone company seemed powerless. Its security folks moved us to one unlisted number after another, half a dozen times. They put special pin codes in place. They put traces on the line. But the troublemaker kept breaking through.
If our hacker had been truly evil and omnipotent as only fictional movie hackers are, there would probably have been even worse ways he could have threatened my privacy. He could have sabotaged my credit rating. He could have eavesdropped on my telephone conversations or siphoned off my e-mail. He could have called in my mortgage, discontinued my health insurance or obliterated my Social Security number. Like Sandra Bullock in the Net, I could have been a digital untouchable, wandering the planet without a connection to the rest of humanity. (Although if I didn’t have to pay back school loans, it might be worth it. Just a thought. )
Still, I remember feeling violated at the time and as powerless as a minnow in a flash flood. Someone was invading my private space—my family’s private space—and there was nothing I or the authorities could do. It was as close to a technological epiphany as I have ever been. And as I watched my personal digital hell unfold, it struck me that our privacy—mine and yours—has already disappeared, not in one Big Brotherly blitzkrieg but in Little Brotherly moments, bit by bit.
Losing control of your telephone, of course, is the least of it. After all, most of us voluntarily give out our phone number and address when we allow ourselves to be listed in the White Pages. Most of us go a lot further than that. We register our whereabouts whenever we put a bank card in an ATM machine or drive through an E-Z Pass lane on the highway. We submit to being photographed every day—20 times a day on average if you live or work in New York City—by surveillance cameras. We make public our interests and our purchasing habits every time we shop by mail order or visit a commercial Website. [br] The writer cited his experience to show that______ .
选项
A、the authorized organization could solve the problem by offering timely help
B、the interloper would be kept back sooner or later
C、the government took personal privacy bit by bit
D、he would lose his privacy gradually
答案
D
解析
细节题。根据文章倒数第二段的内容可知,当作者看到自己的私人数据被展现在别人面前时,让他吃惊的是隐私都已经消失了,这不是在一个专制组织里的闪电战,而是在和缓的情况下一点一点地消失。因此D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4065251.html
相关试题推荐
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
SinceXeroxcouldn’tworksmoothly,heassumedthatsomeonehad______withit.A
Heworked______athistaskforweeksbeforehefeltsatisfiedthattheresults
Atlastthegirlcouldn’tbeartheself-reproach,soshedecidedto______thef
Sheworkedhardathertaskbeforeshefeltsurethattheresultswould______h
Ifyoucouldn’tattendeitheroftheconcertsandare______gnashingyourteeth
Thisisthe(longest)flightI(haveevertaken).BythetimewegettoLosAnge
ThisisthelongestflightIhaveevertaken.BythetimewegettoLosAngeles,
Icouldn’tsleeplastnightbecausethetapinthebathroomwas______.A、spilling
Icouldn’tsleepbecausethetapinthebathroomwas______.A、drainingB、dropping
随机试题
Springishere:flowersareinbloom,birdsongfillstheair,andtheinboxe
Itisanage-old【B1】______:MenarefromMars;WomenarefromVenus.Males
二、考题解析 【教学过程】 (一)导入新课 1.导语:同学们,
“绝对运动中包含着相对静止,相对静止中包含着绝对运动”,这是一种()
男性,40岁。3年来反复咳嗽、咯血,伴黄脓痰一周就诊。X线检查右下肺叶炎性改变。
A.枳实B.黄芩C.青蒿D.杏仁E.人参兴奋下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能的药物是
不动产的托伦斯登记制度的主要特点包括( )。A、不动产权利一经登记便具有绝对
简述评价信度的概念和检查的概念。
为了掌握市场信息,有效安排生产运营,某知名空调生产企业积极进行市场调查和市场预测
Dugas征阳性() A.肩关节脱位 B.肘关节脱位 C.髋关节后上脱位
最新回复
(
0
)