2. 职称英语
  3. In most people’s mind, growth is associated with prosperity. We judge how we

In most people’s mind, growth is associated with prosperity. We judge how we

游客2025-04-27  0
问题     In most people’s mind, growth is associated with prosperity. We judge how well the economy is doing by the size of the Gross National Product (GNP), a measure, supposedly, of growth. Equally axiomatic, however, is the notion that increased pressure on dwindling natural resources must inevitably lead to a decline in prosperity, especially when accompanied by a growth in population. So, which is correct: growth means prosperity and no growth means adversity, or growth means adversity and no growth means...what?
   What growth advocates mean, primarily, when they say growth is necessary for prosperity is that growth is necessary for the smooth functioning of the economic system. In one arena the argument in favor of growth is particularly compelling and that is with regard to the Third World. To argue against growth, other than population growth, in light of Third World poverty and degradation seems callous, if not cruel, the pompous postulating of the comfortable and the secure. But is it? Could it be that growth, especially the growth of the wealthier countries, has contributed to the impoverishment, not the advancement, of Third Word countries? If not, how do we account for the desperate straits these countries find themselves in today after a century of dedication to growth?
   To see how this might be the case we must look at the impact of growth on Third World countries- the reality, not the abstract stages-of-economic-growth nostrum propounded through rose-colored glasses by academicians of the developed world. What good is growth to the people of the Third World if it means the conversion of peasant farms into mechanized agri-businesses producing commodities not for local consumption but for export, if it means the stripping of their land of its mineral and arboreal treasures to the benefit of foreign investors and a handful of their local collaborators, if it means the assumption of a crushing foreign indebtedness, the proceeds of which goes not into the development of the country but into the purchase of luxury cars, the padding of Swiss bank accounts, and the buying of condominiums in Miami?
   Admittedly, this is an oversimplification, which applies to no country in its entirety and to some countries not at all. But the point, I believe, remains valid; that growth in underdeveloped countries cannot simply be judged in the abstract; it must be judged based on the true nature of growth in these societies, on who benefits and who is harmed, on where growth is leading these people and where it has left them. When considered in this way, it just might be that in the present context growth is more detrimental to the well-being of the wretched of the earth than beneficial.
   So, do we need growth for prosperity? Only the adoption of zero growth can provide the answer. But that is a test not easily undertaken. Modem economies are incredibly complex phenomena, a tribute to man’s ability to organize and a challenge to his ability to understanding. Anything that affects their functioning, such as a policy of zero growth, should not be proposed without a wary prudence and a self-doubting humility. But if the prospect of leaping into the economic unknown is fear-inspiring, equally so is the prospect of letting that fear prevent us from acting when the failure to act could mean untold misery for future generations and perhaps environmental catastrophes which threaten our very existence. [br] It is implied in Paragraphs 2 and 3 that______
选项 A、the smooth functioning of the economic system is dependent on sustained prosperity,
B、economic growth has not contributed to the poverty of the Third World countries
C、growth in richer countries is achieved at the expense of the Third Word countries
D、the stages of economic growth cannot be superseded or modified by social mechanisms
答案 C
解析 根据文章第二段最后两句“Could it be that growth，especially the growth of the wealthier countries．has contributed to the impoverishment，not the advancement，of Third Word countries?If not．how do we account for the desperate straits these countries find themselves in today after a century of dedication to growth?”可知，作者提出问题富裕国家的增长是否导致了 第三世界国家的贫困，而不是进步。如果不是这样的话，那么又怎么解释这些国家为什么在 致力于增长的一个世纪之后，今天仍处于绝望而不可自拔的境地呢?作者在第三段给出了答 案，这种增长并没有给这些国家的人们带来好处，而是让外国投资者及少数本地合作者获益。 据此判断，答案是C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4055715.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)