首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
43
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
进行书面投诉可能会对科学家的事业造成严重的后果,一定要三思而后行。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052868.html
相关试题推荐
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
Effortstoprovideprofessionaltraumacounselingassumethattraumaisthe
[originaltext]M:IwishIcouldseeGeorgehere.W:Hewasplanningtocome,bu
Besides"American"characteristics—individualism,self-reliance,informality
属于中枢兴奋药的是A.洛贝林 B.多巴胺 C.氨茶碱 D.洋地黄 E.利
简述用要素记点法进行岗位评价的步骤。(16分)
集体合同中的一般性规定包括()A.工作任务规则 B.集体合同条款的解释 C
(2020年真题)甲是某期货公司客户。某日结算时,甲的保证金水平高于期货交易所规
工作模型的职位特征通过影响()关键的心理状态决定一个职位的激励潜能。A.工作意
断指再植术后28小时患者,发现患指指甲发绀,指腹肿胀,毛细血管反应存在,皮温尚正
检查纤溶异常的化验是() A.出血时间 B.纤维蛋白原定量 C.血块收缩试
最新回复
(
0
)