首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
56
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
任何对失德行为的指控都非常重要,需要认真对待。如果处理不好,这一指控会使被指控人、指控人、相关机构及科学本身受到严重的伤害。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052866.html
相关试题推荐
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
(1)Josephwasanelderly,nay,anoldman:veryold,perhaps,thoughhalean
A.清燥救肺汤 B.杏苏散 C.桑杏汤 D.麦门冬汤 E.百合固金汤患者
缩写为cef-的是A.青霉素类 B.头孢菌素类 C.四环素类 D.卡那霉素
(2015年5月)对人际接触和交往频繁的工作岗位尤为重要的绩效考评效标是()A
信息与消息和信号意义不同,但三者又是互相关联的概念,信息指受信者预先不知道的新内
民用建筑物主要是由基础、墙或柱、楼板层与地面、楼梯、屋顶和()等6个部分组成。A
不符合前列腺癌的描述是A.老年患者多见 B.多发生于前列腺外区 C.多为高分
投标人少于( )个的,招标人应当依法重新招标。A.2 B.3 C.4 D.
土石路堤施工松铺厚度控制在()以内,接近路堤设计标高时,需改用土方填筑。A
(2017年真题)某单代号网络计划如下图,工作A、D之间的时间间隔是( )天
最新回复
(
0
)