首页
登录
职称英语
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal
游客
2025-04-24
48
管理
问题
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line of work. Since f 980 the United States International Trade Commission(ITC) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments. Another 340 charge that foreign companies "dumped" their products in the United States at "less than fair value. " Even when no unfair practices are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been injured by imports is sufficient grounds to seek relief.
Contrary to the general impression, this quest for import relief has hurt more companies than it has helped. As corporations begin to function globally, they develop an intricate web of marketing, production, and research relationships. The complexity of these relationships makes it unlikely that a system of import relief laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under the same parent company.
Internationalization increases the danger that foreign companies will use import relief laws against the very companies the laws were designed to protect. Suppose a United States-owned company establishes an overseas plant to manufacture a product while its competitor makes the same product in the United States, If the competitor can prove injury from the imports and that the United States received a subsidy from a foreign government to build its plant abroad the United States company’s products will be uncompetitive in the United States, since they would be subject to duties.
Perhaps the most brazen case occurred when the ITC investigated allegations that Canadian companies were injuring the United States salt industry by dumping rock salt, used to de-ice roads. The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United States operations was crying for help against a United States company with foreign operations. The "United States" company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a Dutch conglomerate, while the "Canadian" companies included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the second-largest domestic producer of rock salt. (332 words) [br] The passage is chiefly concerned with
选项
A、arguing against the increased internationalization of United States corporations
B、warning that the application of import relief laws frequently has unintended consequences
C、demonstrating that foreign-based firms receive more subsidies from their governments than United States firms receive from the United States government
D、advocating the use of trade restrictions for "dumped" products but not for other imports
答案
B
解析
第二段第一句是对前一段最后一句观点的反驳。作者认为这种做法弊大于利。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4050977.html
相关试题推荐
ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,unfortunately,madethesearchforlegal
ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,unfortunately,madethesearchforlegal
ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,unfortunately,madethesearchforlegal
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Accordingto______acrosstherelevantresearchcommunity,thepublishedattack
Inthelongperiodfrom1500to1800,westernEuropeannation-stateswereal
ThedomesticeconomyintheUnitedStatesexpandedinaremarkablyvigorousa
随机试题
Thereareagreatmanycareersinwhichtheincreasingemphasisisonspecial
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions1-13whicharebasedonReadingP
作为一个保守的基督教徒,他常常倾向于从宗教的角度来看待很多问题。(perspective)AsaconservativeChristian,he
InordertohosttheOlympics,acitymustsubmitaproposaltotheIOC.Aft
热水地面辐射供暖对于管材的要求,下列哪些是错误的?()A.埋地加热管不应有接
某大型电子政务工程建设项目,使用中央财政资金建设。在历经编写项目建议书、可行性研
共用题干 一般资料:求助者,女性,57岁,初中文化程度,退休职工。案例介绍:求
科能公司开发出一种用于少儿英语学习的智能机器人,该产品投放市场不久,便被其它公司
根据《建筑安装工程费用项目组成》(建标【2013】44号文),建筑安装工程生产工
按照我国保险制度,建安工程一切险()。A.由承包人担保 B.包含执业责任
最新回复
(
0
)