首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2025-04-20
13
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choice in that matter. You either have science or you don’t have, and if you have it, you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering the way ahead seems. It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply make up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far they are from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant: the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be true, there may well be questions we can’t think up ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] The author believes that______.
选项
A、man can find solutions sooner or later to whether questions concerning nature he can think up
B、man can not solve the problems he can think up because of the limits of human intellect
C、sooner or later man can think up all the questions concerning nature and answer them
D、questions concerning consciousness are outside the scope of scientific research
答案
A
解析
本题的四个选项中,只有A项为正确答案。这可从文中的内容推知,即在我们的智慧范围之内,如果我们总是坚持不懈,专心致志,就能得到所有问题的答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4045306.html
相关试题推荐
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallyg
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallyg
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallyg
Sciencewritersmust21informationregardingscientificevents.Inthisc
Sciencewritersmust21informationregardingscientificevents.Inthisc
Sciencewritersmust21informationregardingscientificevents.Inthisc
Sciencewritersmust21informationregardingscientificevents.Inthisc
Sciencewritersmust21informationregardingscientificevents.Inthisc
SciencewriterTomStandagedrawsaptparallelsbetweenthetelegraphandth
SciencewriterTomStandagedrawsaptparallelsbetweenthetelegraphandth
随机试题
Perhapsmorethananythingelse,scientistsareeagertofindoutifMartian
Iwanttodiscusssomeideasabouthowwemanageunderground【B1】______.Ifw
ConversationalSkillsPeoplewhousuallymakeusfee
[originaltext]M:Excuseme.DoyouknowwhereDaviesAuditoriumis?W:I’mnot
Researchonanimalintelligencealwaysmakesuswonderjusthowsmarthumans
[originaltext]W:I’mreallyangryatJohn.Heneverlistenstome.M:Takeite
男性,30岁,火焰烧伤总面积70%。颜面、颈、前胸及两上肢为Ⅲ度烧伤(30%),
灭火器维修由具有灭火器维修能力(从业资质)的企业,按照各类灭火器产品生产技术标准
1960年( )提出了“课程改革论”。 A.华生 B.杜威 C.布鲁纳
根据招标投标管理的规定,应视为废标的情形有() A、标书未密封
最新回复
(
0
)