首页
登录
职称英语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to
游客
2025-04-19
35
管理
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent. [br] The word "hordes" used in the passage means______.
选项
A、swarms of fish
B、large groups of people
C、mountain ranges
D、large fields of grain
答案
B
解析
从文中第七段第一句“But even if we forget about self-hordes,what aboutthe cloning of a relatively few individuals?”可知,即使我们忘记大量克隆,克隆一小部分人又能怎样呢?由此推断,hordes和a relatively few individuals是相对的意思。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4043901.html
相关试题推荐
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Itisnaivetoexpect(hatanysocietycanresolveallthesocialproblemsitis
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmach
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktosur
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktosur
Whatoursocietysuffersfrommosttodayistheabsenceofconsensusaboutw
Whatoursocietysuffersfrommosttodayistheabsenceofconsensusaboutw
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Sam,couldyoureviewtheresultsofthesurveyonleisurespo
德育过程主要是培养学生知、情、意、行的过程,这一过程具有()。A.绝对性 B
根据相对购买力平价理论,一组商品的平均价格在英国由5英镑涨到6英镑,同期在美国由
屋架如图所示,则A杆的内力值最接近( )kN。(拉力为(+),压力为(-))
心下痞闷,按之则痛,或心胸闷痛,或咳痰黄稠,舌红苔黄腻,脉滑数,宜选用的方剂是A
下列关于药物稳定性的叙述,正确的是A、通常将反应物消耗一半所需的时间称为有效期
某中学举行运动会,孙某报名参加的是初中部男子800米比赛,当孙某跑完800米时,
下列选项中,关于技术性失业的说法,错误的是()。A.技术性失业属于一种
2016年12月20日,甲公司以4800万元购入一台设备并立即投入使用,预计使用
证实DNA合成是半保留复制的是A.WatSon&CriCk B.WatSon&
最新回复
(
0
)