2. 职称英语
  3. The case for college has been accepted without question for more than a gene

The case for college has been accepted without question for more than a gene

游客2025-04-08  50
问题     The case for college has been accepted without question for more than a generation. All high school graduates ought to go, says conventional wisdom and statistical evidence, because college will help them earn more money, become "better" people, and learn to be more responsible citizens than those who don’t go.
    But college has never been able to work its magic for everyone. And now that close to half our high school graduates are attending, those who don’t fit the pattern are becoming more numerous, and more obvious. College graduates are selling shoes and driving taxis; college students interfere with each other’s experiments and write false letters of recommendation in the intense competition for admission to graduate school. Others find no stimulation in their studies, and drop out — often encouraged by college administrators.
    Some observers say the fault is with the young people themselves — they are spoiled and they are expecting too much. But that is a condemnation of the students as a whole, and does not explain all campus unhappiness. Others blame the state of the world, and they are partly right. We’ve been told that young people have to go to college because our economy cannot absorb an army of untrained 18-year-olds. But disappointed graduates are learning that it can no longer absorb an army of trained 22-year-olds, either.
    Some adventuresome educators and campus watchers have openly begun to suggest that college may not be the best, the proper, the only place for every young person after the completion of high school. We may have been looking at all those surveys and statistics upside down, it seems, and through the rosy glow of our own remembered college experiences. Perhaps college does not make people intelligent, ambitious, happy, liberal, or quick to learn things — maybe it’s just the other way around, and intelligent, ambitious, happy, liberal, quick-learning people are only the ones who have been attracted to college in the first place. And perhaps all those successful college graduates would have been successful whether they had gone to college or not. This is heresy(异端邪说)to those of us who have been brought up to believe that if little schooling is good, more has to be much better. But contrary evidence is beginning to mount up. [br] In the Line 2, the 2nd paragraph, "those who don’t fit the pattern" refers to______.
选项 A、high-school graduates who aren’t suitable for college education
B、college graduates who are selling shoes and driving taxis
C、college students who aren’t any better for their higher education
D、High school graduates who failed to be admitted to college
答案 C
解析 细节推理题。文章第二段主要论述作者对大学教育的质疑。those who don’t fit the pattern是对第一段所提及的上大学的好处的反例。在首段中作者论及上大学可以help them earn more money，become“better”people，与选项C中的内容对应。故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4032392.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)