首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2025-04-06
21
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering seems the way ahead. It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps.
Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] Which of the following statements is NOT true of scientists in earlier times?
选项
A、They invented false theories to explain things they didn’t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know all about nature.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
细节判断题。根据题干关键词scientists in earlier times定位到原文第二段尾句。原句中的eitherpretended to understand how things worked(假装知道事物如何发展),or ignored the problem(忽略这些问题),or simply made up stories to fill the gaps(编造一些故事来进行解释)分别与选项B、D、A的内容对应,只有选项C的内容未提到。故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4029469.html
相关试题推荐
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
MichaelYessis,anemeritusprofessorofSportsScienceatCaliforniaState
MichaelYessis,anemeritusprofessorofSportsScienceatCaliforniaState
Scienceisadominantthemeinourculture.Sinceittouchesalmosteveryfa
Scienceisadominantthemeinourculture.Sinceittouchesalmosteveryfa
Scienceisadominantthemeinourculture.Sinceittouchesalmosteveryfa
You’rebusyfillingouttheapplicationformforapositionyoureallyneed;
You’rebusyfillingouttheapplicationformforapositionyoureallyneed;
Scienceisanenterpriseconcernedwithgaininginformationaboutcausality,
随机试题
Hegivesusalotoftrouble,butIlikehim______.A、bythewayB、allthesameC
(1)InayearwhenAlGorewontheNobelPeacePrizeandgreenbecamethenew
Abroadpublicdiscussionofenvironmentalproblemsbeganinthemid-1980s,
Thetypicalpre-industrialfamilynotonlyhadagoodmanychildren,butnum
[originaltext]W:Hey,Iheardyouarejustbackfromatrip.Nowonderyoulook
Asamodestlady,she______(从未认为自己很了不起).hasneverthoughttoohighlyofherse
重复抽样的抽样标准误差一定大于不重置抽样的抽样平均误差。()
下列各物质的化学键中,只存在σ键的是:
阐释与建构,是_______的。遍观中国思想史、美学史,“通”与“变”之间多是通
A.非适应证用药 B.超适应证用药 C.过度治疗用药 D.盲目联合用药
最新回复
(
0
)