首页
登录
职称英语
We are in a global health crisis, and it grows worse by the year, as the Worl
We are in a global health crisis, and it grows worse by the year, as the Worl
游客
2025-03-30
0
管理
问题
We are in a global health crisis, and it grows worse by the year, as the World Health Organization has warned that by 2030 almost half the world’s population will be overweight or obese if current trends continue. There are already 124 million obese children, a more than tenfold increase in four decades, and more than a million of these live in the UK, which has the worst obesity rates in western Europe. Four in five will grow up to be obese adults; and the leader of the UK’s paediatric body warns that this will cost them 10 to 20 years of healthy life.
This is a social problem, both in cause and consequence, as concurred by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the UK’s National Health Service, whose cautioning that obesity could bankrupt the health service comes across as the placard-wielding stance of a roadside prophet of doom — yet the government’s response has been as modest and inadequate as these figures are shocking. Medical experts describe its childhood obesity strategy as weak, embarrassing and even insulting. Though it inherited a tax on sugary drinks, it rowed back from restrictions on price-cutting promotions and junk food marketing or advertising, leaving its strategy to rely heavily on measures such as school activity programmes.
Campaigners had warned that would not be enough; now research proves they were right — even when such initiatives tackle both diet and exercise, and make efforts to reach out to families. Children in schools in England’s West Midlands were given a year of extra physical activity sessions, a healthy eating programme and cookery workshops with their parents, all of which failed to have any significant effect on children’s weight.
The causes of the obesity epidemic are multiple and complex, as the landmark Foresight report produced over a decade ago underscored: we live in an obesogenic environment, and some more so than others (more than twice as many children in deprived areas are obese as in affluent areas). TVs and smartphones in bedrooms and reliance on cars play their part; so too do food deserts, where fruit and vegetables are expensive or inaccessible, which leaves the more economically strapped sector of the population choosing to fill a hungry child with donuts rather than apples.
But one factor leaps out: greed. The problem is not gluttony by a generation of Augustus Gloops but the avarice of the Willy Wonkas who press junk food on consumers, then profess surprise at the results. The tactics of big food are, as the global health organisation Vital Strategies points out in its report Fool Me Twice, strikingly similar to those of big tobacco over the years. But big food has the advantage that everyone needs to eat, while no one needs to smoke, and that a biscuit does not damage health as a cigarette does, obesity notwithstanding. Thus, these companies tell us that we should not restrict individual freedom; that it is up to people to show self-discipline; and that their products are fine as occasional indulgences — never mind that they present family-size packs as if they are suitable for individuals, nor that highly processed foods, packed with salt and sugar, tend to be cheaper to produce, store and deliver—as well as being habit-forming.
Other countries have been far bolder in tackling the industry, instead of relying on voluntary action. In Latin America, governments have forced companies to remove cartoon characters — naturally an instant appeal to young children—from cereal boxes, imposed junk food taxes and ordered school tuck shops to replace high-salt/sugar products with fruit and vegetables. Tougher rules reshape consumer perceptions and decisions and in doing so, they can also push companies into changing products.
A ban on junk food advertising before the 9pm watershed is long overdue. It should be supplemented by a ban on promotions and price cuts for "sharing" bags of chocolates, as Action on Sugar urged last month, and the sugar tax on drinks could be extended to food products, with the revenue channelled into initiatives making fresh produce more affordable and attractive to consumers. The government’s failure to force change means that the rest of us will pay the price — in ill health and higher taxes—as big food rakes in the profits. [br] Who does the author believe to be primarily responsible for failing to stop obesity?
选项
A、Parents.
B、Advertisers.
C、Government.
D、Manufacturers.
答案
C
解析
本题为事实细节题。定位至文章第二段“yet the government’s response has been as modest and inadequate as these figures are shocking”,作者认为,数据之所以如此令人震惊,是由于政府做得太少,不够好。因此本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4018740.html
相关试题推荐
Overathirdofthepopulationwasestimatedtohaveno______tothehealthservi
Asianeconomiccrisishasonlya______effectonthelivesofChinesepeople.A、di
Fromthehealthpointofviewwearelivinginamarvelousage.Weareimmun
Fromthehealthpointofviewwearelivinginamarvelousage.Weareimmun
Fromthehealthpointofviewwearelivinginamarvelousage.Weareimmun
TheSocialSecurityActdidnotincludehealthinsurancebecausethecommission
TheInternetisaglobalnetworkthatconnectsothercomputernetworks,toge
TheInternetisaglobalnetworkthatconnectsothercomputernetworks,toge
TheInternetisaglobalnetworkthatconnectsothercomputernetworks,toge
Cigarettesmokingisagreathealth______andmayleadtofataldiseases.(2004年武
随机试题
Whatisthesourceofeachonebelowinthissurvey?ChooseFOURanswersfromth
[originaltext]AnenvironmentalgroupcalledtheFoodCommissionisunhappy
作为评价投资中心业绩的指标,投资利润率的优点有()。A.具有横向可比性 B.能
泰柏板即钢丝网泡沫塑料水泥砂浆复合墙板,下列有关其性能规格的要点,哪一条为正确的
风险系数为50%属于高风险,要非常谨慎才能进行,对于高风险的演出项目最好寻求投资
下列关于攻毒杀虫止痒药说法不正确的是A.有解毒疗疮,攻毒杀虫的功效 B.可用于
中间商的购买决策主要包括( )。 A.消费水平决策 B.供货监督决策
A出口公司,出口一批货物给B进口公司,需船舶运输,货物CIF价为3亿美元,A公司
爱国主义是历史的、具体的,在不同的历史条件和文化背景下所形成的爱国主义,总是具有
A.短时间暴露于强噪声,使听阈上升10~15dB,脱离噪声接触后数分钟内即可恢复
最新回复
(
0
)