首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2025-03-30
34
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] What does the word "negligence" mean in the passage?
选项
A、ignorance
B、arrogance
C、carelessness
D、depression
答案
C
解析
根据文中第三段的“Mr.Farwell,an engineer,lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track.”可知:法威尔先生是铁路部门的名工程师。当名扳道工因疏忽而导致车头脱离轨道时,法威尔失去了右手。从中可以推知,negligence意为“疏忽,过失”。四个选项中,ignorance意为“无知,愚昧”,arrogance意为“傲慢”,carelessness意为“粗心,疏忽”,depression意为“沮丧;经济大萧条”。据此可知,C项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4018413.html
相关试题推荐
Theyearsbetween1870and1895broughtenormouschangestothetheaterint
Theyearsbetween1870and1895broughtenormouschangestothetheaterint
Theyearsbetween1870and1895broughtenormouschangestothetheaterint
Theyearsbetween1870and1895broughtenormouschangestothetheaterint
Currentdatasuggestthat,although______statesbetweenfearandaggressionexi
Banksshallbeunableto______,orclaimreliefagainstthefirst15%ofanyloa
Peopleofallcountriesareexpectedto______theprinciplesoftheUnitedNation
Hersuccessfuljumpbroughta______cheerfromthecrowd.A、spontaneousB、homogeno
Duringthe19thcentury,JewsinmostEuropeancountriesachievedsomeequality
Europeanconservatives,untiltheendofthe19thcentury,rejecteddemocraticp
随机试题
Judgingfromrecentsurveys,mostexpertsinsleepbehavioragreethatthere
(76)Concerningmoneyoranythingelse,conflictsbetweenhusbandandwifeus
ResearchintoDNAhashadasignificantimpactonmedicine.Throughrecombina
[originaltext]W:Goodeveningandwelcometotonight’seditionofLegendaryLiv
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledOnthe
糖皮质激素免疫抑制作用的机制是()A:抑制巨噬细胞吞噬功能 B:稳定溶酶体膜
A
姜某与某混凝土有限公司因合同纠纷引发诉讼,法院判决姜某经营的某工程有限公司给付货
患儿,女性,6岁,右下颌第二乳磨牙残冠,髓室底完整,近中根根吸收约1/3,X线检
某单项工程的单位建筑工程预算为1000万元,单位安装工程预算为500万元,设备购
最新回复
(
0
)