2. 职称英语
  3. Global Developments Sociologists tell us there is a link

Global Developments Sociologists tell us there is a link

游客2025-02-07  54
问题                     Global Developments
    Sociologists tell us there is a link between private lives and social forces. An outstanding example of such a link is the contrast in life chances between people in developed and in less developed countries. A child born in, say, the United States or Switzerland is not a better or more deserving person than one born in Ethiopia or Brazil. Yet because of social forces beyond individual control, each child faces the prospect of living out a lifetime under utterly different material conditions. Why should this be? What can account for the fact that some societies have become heavily industrialized and economically advanced, while others are changing so much more slowly? Social scientists have offered two different explanations. One emphasizes a universal but uneven process of modernization and economic growth; the other focuses on a worldwide system of political and economic inequality.   Some social scientists view development in terms of modernization, a process of economic, social and cultural change that facilitates the transition from pre-industrial to industrial society. Modernization theorists claim that the various countries of the world are converging on a basically similar social type, the modern industrialized society. Some 250 years ago, the developed countries of today also had rudimentary, pre-industrial economies, but because they modernized relatively quickly, they now have productive economies that offer high living standards. During the same period, however, the poor countries have been slow to modernize.  Differences in development, therefore, are largely the result of uneven modernization; but as "modern" features spread from the developed to the less developed countries, they too will follow the path to industrialization and affluence.   What kinds of change does modernization entail? Some modernization theorists emphasize a change in individual psychology. They claim that people in the developed societies are more likely to have a work ethic, a desire for achievement, a willingness to defer gratification, a sense of control over their destiny, a strong sense of individualism. In contrast, a lack of ambition, an orientation toward the present, a fatalistic outlook, and a weak sense of individualism are said to be typical of people in more traditional societies.
(A) [■] Other modernization theorists emphasize sweeping structural changes in society.
(B) [■] Traditional societies are more likely to have an extended family system, in which kinship obligations encourage people to remain, physically and socially, where they started.  
(C) [■] Similarly,  modernization involves such features as heavy urbanization, extensive schooling, advanced technology, low population growth, a legal-rational political system, and a range of sophisticated services such as efficient transport, banking and communications.
(D) [■] On the whole, these features are lacking or inadequate in less developed countries, where government is usually authoritarian, the population is predominately rural and ill educated, and the necessary services are not in place.   Other social scientists view development in the context of the world system, a network of unequal economical and political relationships among the developed and the less developed countries. This international system consists of a "core" of highly industrialized countries, and a "periphery" of less developed countries that are dependent on and exploited by those at the core. World-system theorists point out that the peoples of the third world were quite capable of providing for themselves before "modern" ideas and technologies began to "diffuse" from the colonial powers. In fact, they claim, development and underdevelopment proceeded simultaneously over a period of more than two centuries as the richer countries financed their own industrial expansion by draining the surplus resources of the poorer ones. The colonial system finally broke down when the last of the colonies won their formal independence around the middle of the twentieth century. But by then a new international relationship had been established: neocolonialism, the informal political and economic domination of some societies by others, such that the former are able to exploit the labor and resources of the latter for their own purposes. In essence, the world system is a form of international stratification, with a wealthy minority enjoying a disproportionate share of the planet’s resources and using various means—political, economic, and sometimes military—to maintain their position. [br] Based on the information in Paragraph 4, which of the following best explains neocolonialism?
选项 A、It’s a period when the economies of third world countries were diversified and self-sufficient.
B、It’s a period when a large part of the population of less developed countries was forced to abandon traditional economic activities.
C、It’s a new form of colonialism after the collapse of traditional colonialism when developed countries exploit less developed countries.
D、It’s a period when less developed countries begin to enjoy their equal share of the planet’s resources with developed countries.
答案 C
解析 本题为事实信息题，主要考查考生抓住文章中阐明的信息并排除干扰项的能力。题目问：根据第四段的信息，下列哪一项最好地解释了新殖民主义。第四段下半部分讲述了有关世界体系的观点，认为尽管殖民体系已经瓦解，但是现在发展中国家在经济和政治上被发达国家剥削的现状并没有改变，所以这是一种新殖民主义。选项C直接表达了这一观点，即这是发达国家对发展中国家的一种新的剥削(exploit)，所以应该选择C。其他选项明显与这一说法相去甚远，因此只是起干扰作用而已。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3947400.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)