Research on friendship has established a number of facts, some interesting, some

游客2025-01-28 29

问题 Research on friendship has established a number of facts, some interesting, some even useful. Did you know that the average student has five to six friends, or that a friend who was previously an enemy is liked more than one who has always been on the right side? Would you believe that physically attractive individuals are preferred as friends to those less comely, and is it fair that physically attractive defendants are less likely to be found guilty in court? Unfortunately, such titbits do not tell us much more about the nature or the purpose of friendship.
In fact, studies of friendship seem to implicate more complex factors. For example, one function friendship seems to fulfill is that it supports the image we have of ourselves, and confirms the value of the attitudes we hold. Certainly we appear to project ourselves onto our friends; several studies have shown that we judge them to be more like us than they (objectively) are. This suggests that we ought to choose friends who are similar to us ("birds of a feather") rather than those who would be complementary ("opposites attract"). In our experiment, some developing friendships were monitored amongst first-year students living in the same hostel. It was found that similarity of attitudes (toward politics, religion and ethics, pastimes and aesthetics) was a good predictor of what friendships would be established by the end of the four months, though it had less to do with initial alliances—not surprisingly, since attitudes may not be obvious on first inspection.
There have also been studies of pairings, both voluntary (married couples) and forced (student roommates), to see who remained together and who split up. Again, the evidence seems to favor similarity rather than complementarity as an omen of a successful relationship, though there is a complication: when marriage is concerned, once the field has been narrowed down to potential mates who come from similar backgrounds and share a broad range of attitudes and values, a degree of complementarity seems to become desirable. When a couple is not just similar but almost identical, something else seems to be needed. Similarity can breed contempt; it has also been found that when we find others obnoxious, we dislike them more if they are like us than when they are dissimilar.
The difficulty of linking friendship with similarity of personality probably reflects the complexity of our personalities: we have many facets and therefore require a disparate group of friends to support us. This, of course, can explain why we may have two close friends who have little in common and indeed dislike each other. By and large, though, it looks as though we would do well to choose friends (and spouses) who resemble us. If this were not so, computer dating agencies would have gone out of business years ago. [br] The word "disparate" underlined in Paragraph 4 means ______.

选项 A、dissatisfied
B、disruptive
C、discontented
D、dissimilar

答案 D

解析 disparate意为“迥然不同的，无法比较的”。disparate前提到complexity of our personalities“人格的复杂性”，后面提到两个好友其实相同点很少。据此可以推断disparate是“不同的”的意思，故选D“不相似的，不同的”。同时排除A“不满意的”、B“扰乱的”和C“不满的”。

转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3933055.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

Research on friendship has established a number of facts, some interesting, some

Instead,theagencywouldofferitsservicesinresearchanddevelopmenttobutt

Thestudyofthepropertiesofnumbers,Platotellsus,habituatesthemindtot

TheresearcherfoundthatonlyahandfuloftroopsofYunnansnub-nosedmonkeys