首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplo
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplo
游客
2025-01-20
47
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power" — i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America — it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru — most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America — think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales — it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade — partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority — this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an
entreguista
and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area — increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sectpr — a sector of tremendous strategic importance — the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] The main idea of Paragraph 5 is that______.
选项
A、the U.S. cooperation with Latin American countries often encounters political resistance
B、the space cooperation between the United States and Brazil is likely to succeed
C、the U.S. is unwilling to cooperate with Brazil in space exploration
D、China is willing to cooperate with Brazil in space exploration
答案
A
解析
主旨题。该题为段落主旨题,关键在于找出中心句,而段落中心句一般位于段首。分析第5段结构可知,第1句(那常常使得与美国合作的政治代价高昂)为中心句,接着举了两个例子说明该句观点,故正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3920333.html
相关试题推荐
AttheendofarecentfeastatRestaurantRevolutioninNewOrleans,Iorder
AttheendofarecentfeastatRestaurantRevolutioninNewOrleans,Iorder
AttheendofarecentfeastatRestaurantRevolutioninNewOrleans,Iorder
AttheendofarecentfeastatRestaurantRevolutioninNewOrleans,Iorder
AttheendofarecentfeastatRestaurantRevolutioninNewOrleans,Iorder
Foratimehe______acareerasanarmymedicaldoctor,buthisfamilyobligation
Therepublicationofthepoet’smostrecentworkwillcertainly______hisnationa
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdiplo
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdiplo
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdiplo
随机试题
Whatarethewaysanimalscommunicate?[br][originaltext]Whenwethinkof
Greenpeaceisaninternational(organize)______thatworkstoprotecttheenvir
下列哪项符合系膜毛细血管性肾小球肾炎A.起病急骤 B.常表现急性肾炎综合征
阶段性股权投资的类型主要包括()。A.对拟上市公司的阶段性股权投资 B.对上
明代著名无神论思想家、哲学家写道:“初入社学,八岁以下者,先读——以习见闻,以便
苍术有苦燥之性对生物体有害,是由于含有过量某成分,该成分为A.生物碱B.挥发油C
咽喉肿痛患者宜选用咽喉肿痛患者宜选用A.苍术 B.桔梗 C.厚朴 D.川贝
蓄电池组正极和负极引出电缆不应共用一根电缆,并采用(____)。(A)单根多股铜
证券投资基金在美国称( )A:共同基金B:证券投资信托基金C:指数基金D:
疟疾典型临床发作的机制是由于( )。A.疟原虫在肝细胞内增殖 B.疟原虫在红
最新回复
(
0
)