首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without
[originaltext] This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without
游客
2025-01-17
34
管理
问题
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased. "It’s eliminating a connector and adding inconvenience in the name of profit," one commenter wrote. "Apple wants to see just how stupid the public really is," said another. " There is absolutely no reason to get rid of a perfectly working universal headphone jack," added a third.
As it turns out, there is a reason. The plug itself is small. But the corresponding receptacle on the inside of the phone is relatively enormous. By removing it, Apple says, it was able to fit in a bigger battery, giving the iPhone 7 two more hours of life per charge, a stabilized camera for fewer blurry photographs and stereo speakers.
Apple includes, in the box, both a new pair of earbuds and a two-inch adapter for existing headphones. But those wired approaches are meant to be stopgap measures until we all buy wireless headphones, which now cost as little as $ 17.
Apple’s inclination to kill of "standard" components in the name of progress is no surprise. This, after all, was the company that famously eliminated floppy drives, CD-ROM drives and dial-up modems. And it got rid of physical keyboards on smartphones. It has discontinued a series of its own connectors, such as ADB, SCSI, Fire Wire and the original iPhone charging jack. And every single time, the public is outraged.
So the pattern is now clear: The tech companies change some way of doing something. The public screams bloody murder. But a couple of years later we’ve all adopted the new technology and forgotten the old one. It’s probably been years since you pined for the blistering speed of a dial-up modem and a decade since you wished you had a floppy drive. Does that mean we’re stupid and nearsighted? Not exactly. In the case of tech, there’s a cost to each of these changes. There’s a monetary cost, of course. By the time the industry abandoned the floppy-disk and CD-ROM standards, our collections of those disks were rendered worthless. And in the case of the disappearing headphone jack, there will be the cost of new wireless earbuds. There’s also a learning cost. Every time someone takes away a skill we’ve mastered and introduces one we haven’t, that’s a time-consuming challenge. There’s even a convenience cost.
During the transitional period to the new standard, we often have to buy and carry some bridge technology, such as external DVD drives, USB modems — or headphone-jack adapters. Above all, though, there’s a psychological cost to change, a helpless, primitive "Who moved my cheese?" reaction. As a species, we don’t like lifestyle changes even if logic tells us that we should make them. (See also: climate change, diet, smoking.)
That’s because, at its heart, change means leaping into the unknown. And the unknown — as our Neandertal ancestors approaching a dark cave could have told you — is frightening. The big tech companies will always want to swat their public along into the future. In the end, resistance is futile — but it’s also entirely understandable.
选项
答案
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased.
"It’s eliminating a connector and adding inconvenience in the name of profit," one commenter wrote. " Apple wants to see just how stupid the public really is," said another. " There is absolutely no reason to get rid of a perfectly working universal headphone jack," added a third.
As it turns out, there is a reason.
The plug itself is small. But the corresponding receptacle on the inside of the phone is relatively enormous.
By removing it, Apple says, it was able to fit in a bigger battery, giving the iPhone 7 two more hours of life per charge,
a stabilized camera for fewer blurry photographs and stereo speakers.
Apple includes, in the box, both a new pair of earbuds and a two-inch adapter for existing headphones. But those wired approaches are meant to be stopgap measures until we all buy
wireless headphones, which now cost as little as $ 17.
Apple’s inclination to kill of "standard" components in the name of progress is no surprise.
This, after all, was the company that famously eliminated floppy drives, CD-ROM drives and dial-up modems. And it got rid of physical keyboards on smartphones. It has discontinued a series of its own connectors, such as ADB, SCSI, Fire Wire and the original iPhone charging jack. And every single time, the public is outraged.
So the pattern is now clear; The tech companies change some way of doing something.
The public screams bloody murder.
But a couple of years later we’ve all adopted the new technology and forgotten the old one.
It’s probably been years since you pined for the blistering speed of a dial-up modem and a decade since you fished you had a floppy drive. Does that mean we’re stupid and nearsighted? Not exactly. In the case of tech ,
there’s a cost to each of these changes. There’s a monetary cost,
of course. By the time the industry abandoned the floppy-disk and CD-ROM standards, our collections of those disks were rendered worthless. And in the case of
the disappearing headphone jack, there will be the cost of new wireless earbuds. There’s also a learning cost.
Every time
someone takes away a skill we’ve mastered and introduces one we haven’t
, that’s a time-consuming challenge.
There’s even a convenience cost.
During the transitional period to the new standard, we often have to buy and carry some bridge technology
, such as external
DVD drives, U. S. B modems
— or
headphone-jack adapters.
Above all, though ,
there’s a psychological cost to change,
a helpless, primitive "Who moved my cheese?" reaction. As a species, we don’t like lifestyle changes even if logic tells us that we should make them. (See also: climate change, diet, smoking.)
That’s because, at its heart ,
change means leaping into the unknown.
And the unknown — as our Neandertal ancestors approaching a dark cave could have told you — is frightening.
The big tech companies will always want to swat their public along into the future.
In the end,
resistance is futile — but it’s also entirely understandable.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3916023.html
相关试题推荐
Whyarehackersneededinscience?[br][originaltext]Scienceurgentlyneeds
What’sthemotivationtoknowaboutcoworkers’lives?[br][originaltext]To
What’sthemotivationtoknowaboutcoworkers’lives?[originaltext]Tokeept
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaboutnightmares?[br][originaltext]Nigh
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaboutnightmares?[br][originaltext]Nigh
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaboutnightmares?[originaltext]Nightmares
WhatmadeCopakeprosperousinthe1950s?[br][originaltext]Copakeisabout
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?[br][originaltext]Africahasl
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?[br][originaltext]Africahasl
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?[br][originaltext]Africahasl
随机试题
两名运动员虽都未进入决赛,但都表现的很好。(neither,whom从句)Bothplayersneitherofwhomreachedthefi
TheArtofFriendshipA)OneeveningafewyearsagoIf
[originaltext](l)Roadtrafficcrasheskill1.25millionpeopleeachyear
你持有9个月后到期的国债期货,如果利率期限结构上的所有利率在这9个月中整
下列哪项为急性胃炎的病因()A.吸烟 B.胆汁反流 C.免疫因素 D
医疗机构对突发公共卫生事件致病人员必须接诊治疗,并书写详细、完整的病历记录( )
外斐试验属于( )。A.直接凝集试验 B.间接凝集试验 C.补体结合试验
患者女性,74岁。夜间突然出现心前区剧痛,并向两肩、后背和左臂放射,伴大汗,休息
工程量清单补充项目的编码由附录的顺序码与B和()位阿拉伯数字组成。A.三
在()评估中,报告撰写者应该指明能否用其他培训方案更经济地达成同样的效果。A.
最新回复
(
0
)