首页
登录
职称英语
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for s
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for s
游客
2025-01-04
34
管理
问题
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for students except it lasts for months. Great applications tell us we’ve done our job well, by attracting top-caliber students. But it’s challenging to maintain the frenetic pace without forgetting these are all real people with real aspirations--people whose life stories we are here to unravel, if they will let us.
The essay is a key piece of learning those life stories. I live near Los Angeles, where every day screenplays are read without regard for human context. The writer’s life and dreams don’t matter--all that matters is the writing, the ideas, the end product. On the other hand, in reading essays, context does matter: who wrote this? We are driven to put the jigsaw puzzle together because we think we are building a community, not just choosing neat stories. When I pick up a file, I want to know whether the student has sib lings or not, who his parents are, where he went to high school. Then I want the essay to help the rest of the application make sense, to humanize all the numbers that flow past. I am looking for insight.
A brilliantly written essay may compel me to look beyond superficial shortcomings in an application. But if no recommendation or grade or test score hints at such writing talent, I may succumb to cynicism and assume the writer had help--maybe too much. In the worst cases, I may find that I have read it be fore--with name and place changed--on the Internet, in an essay-editing service or a "best essays" book.
The most appealing essays take the opportunity to show a voice not rendered homogeneous and pasteurized. But sometimes the essays tell us too much. Pomona offers this instruction with one essay option: "We realize that not everything done in life is about getting into college. Tell us about something you did that was just plain fun. "One student grimly reported that nothing was fun because in his family everything was about getting into college. Every activity, course choice and spare moment. It did spark our sympathy, but it almost led to a call to Child Protective Services as well.
Perfection isn’t required. We have seen phenomenal errors in essays that haven’t damaged a student at all. I recall a student who wrote of the July 1969 lunar landing of-I kid you not--Louis Armstrong. I read on, shaking my head. This student was great--a jazz trumpeter who longed to study astronomy. It was a classic slip and perhaps a hurried merging of two personal heroes. He was offered admission, graduated and went on for a PhD in astrophysics. He may not have been as memorable if he had named "Neil" instead of "Louis" in his essay’s opening line. Hey, we’re human, too.
An essay that is rough around the edges may still be compelling. Good ideas make an impression, even when expressed with bad punctuation and spelling errors. Energy and excitement can be communicated. I’m not suggesting the "I came, I saw, I conquered" approach to essay writing, nor the "I saved the world" angle taken by some students who write about community service projects. I’m talking about smaller moments that are well captured. Essays don’t require the life tragedy that so many seem to think is necessary. Not all admission offers come out of sympathy!
Admissions officers, even at the most selective institutions, really aren’t looking for perfection in 17 and 18-year-olds. We are looking for the human being behind the roster of activities and grades. We are looking for those who can let down their guard just a bit to allow others in We are looking for people whose egos won’t get in the way of learning, students whose investment in ideas and words tells us in the context of their records--that they are aware of a world beyond their own homes, schools, grades and scores. A picture, they say, is worth a thousand words. To us, an essay that reveals a student’s unaltered voice is worth much, much more. [br] The sentence "Hey, we’re human, too." in the fifth paragraph implies that ______.
选项
A、man should look before they leap.
B、man might shrink back from difficulties.
C、man should be severe with themselves.
D、it is hard for man to avoid mistakes.
答案
D
解析
语义理解题。首句点明:Perfection isn’t required.接下来给出例子:一个学生将1969年登月的宇航员名字记错了,但还是被录取了,后来读了博士学位。可见段末那句话的意思是说;人无完人,犯错很正常。故[D]为答案。[A]“三思而后行”;[B]“知难而退”和[C]“严于律己”与此处语境无关,排除.
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3897787.html
相关试题推荐
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekfors
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekfors
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekfors
Inthecollegeadmissionswars.weparentsarethetruegladiators.We’repus
Inthecollegeadmissionswars.weparentsarethetruegladiators.We’repus
ForAmerica’scolleges,Januaryisamonthofreckoning.Mostapplicationsfor
ForAmerica’scolleges,Januaryisamonthofreckoning.Mostapplicationsfor
ForAmerica’scolleges,Januaryisamonthofreckoning.Mostapplicationsfor
ForAmerica’scolleges,Januaryisamonthofreckoning.Mostapplicationsfor
PoliceofficersinKolkatarefusedtoattendawomanwhowasshotbyrobberstry
随机试题
(Fighting)broke(out)(between)theNorthern(states)andSouthernstates.A、Fig
Whetheryoulivetoeatoreattolive,foodisamajor________ineveryfamily
Drought,tsunami,violentcrime,financialmeltdown—theworldisfullofris
阅读以下说明和C++代码,将应填入(n)处的语句或语句成分写在答题纸的对应栏
A.抗菌为主 B.抗病毒为主 C.扩容为主 D.对症为主 E.补液为主流
操作票应保存()。 A.三个月B.六个月C.九个月
企业社会工作的服务对象主要是()。A.职工 B.职工家属 C.职工以及职工家
下列关于核准制特点的说法,错误的是()。 A.发挥股票发行审核委员会的独立
人力资源需求小于供给的基本对策主要包括()。A.延长现有员工的工作时间 B.
以下国家中,政府预算年度采用历年制的国家是()。A.美国 B.英国 C.日
最新回复
(
0
)