首页
登录
职称英语
The problem with the nature-nurture debate is that this is an inadequate way
The problem with the nature-nurture debate is that this is an inadequate way
游客
2025-01-01
33
管理
问题
The problem with the nature-nurture debate is that this is an inadequate way of understanding human freedom. Like every other organism, humans are shaped by both nature and nurture. But unlike any other organism, we are also defined by our ability to transcend both, by our capacity to overcome the constraints imposed both by our genetic and our cultural heritage.
It is not that human beings have floated free of the laws of causation. It is rather that humans are not simply the passive end result of a chain of causes, whether natural or environmental. We have developed the capacity to intervene actively in both nature and culture, to shape both to our will.
To put this another way, humans, uniquely, are subjects as well as objects. We are biological beings, and under the purview of biological and physical laws. But we are also conscious beings with purpose and agency, traits the possession of which allow us to design ways of breaking the constraints of biological and physical laws.
All non-human animals are constrained by the tools that nature has bequeathed them through natural selection, and by the environmental conditions in which they find themselves. No animal is capable of asking questions or generating problems that are irrelevant to its immediate circumstances or its evolutionarily designed needs.
When a beaver builds a dam, it doesn’t ask itself why it does so, or whether there is a better way of doing it. When a swallow flies south, it doesn’t wonder why it is hotter in Africa or what would happen if it flew still further south. Humans do ask themselves these and many other kinds of questions questions that have no relevance, indeed make little sense, in the context of evolved needs and goals.
What marks out humans is our capacity to go beyond our naturally defined goals such as the need to find food, shelter or a mate and to establish human-created goals. Our evolutionary heritage certainly shapes the way that humans approach the world. But it does not limit it.
Similarly, our cultural heritage influences the ways in which we think about the world and the kinds of questions we ask of it, but it does not imprison them. If membership of a particular culture absolutely shaped our worldview, then historical change would never be possible:
If the people of medieval Europe had been totally determined by the worldview sustained by medieval European culture, it would not have been possible for that society to have become anything different. It would not have been possible, for instance, to have developed new ideas about individualism and materialism, or to have created new totals of technology and new political institutions.
Human beings are not automata who simply respond blindly to whatever culture in which they find themselves, any more than they are automata that blindly respond to their evolutionary heritage. There is a tension between the way a culture shapes individuals within its purview and the way that those individuals respond to that culture, just as there is a tension between the way natural selection shapes the way that humans think about the world and the way that humans respond to our natural heritage. This tension allows people to think critically and imaginatively, and to look beyond a particular culture’s horizons.
In the six million years since the human and chimpanzee lines first diverged on either side of Africa’s Great Rift Valley, the behaviour and lifestyles of chimpanzees have barely changed. Human behaviour and lifestyles clearly have. Humans have learned to learn from previous generations, to improve upon their work, and to establish a momentum to human life and culture that has taken us from cave art to quantum physics and to the unraveling of the genome. It is this capacity for constant innovation that distinguishes humans from all other animals.
All animals have an evolutionary past. Only humans make history. The historical, transformative quality of being human is why the so-called nature-nurture debate, while creating considerable friction, has thrown little light on what it means to be human. To understand human freedom we need to understand not so much whether we are creatures of nature or nurture, but how, despite being shaped by’ both nature and nurture, we are also able to transcend both. [br] A beaver builds a dam because ______.
选项
A、it imitates human behavior
B、it tries to find a better way of living
C、dam-building is relevant to its evolved needs and goals
D、a dam helps a beaver to go beyond its evolutionarily determined circumstances
答案
C
解析
根据第4、5段,其他动物受到自然选择所带来的工具和环境的束缚;没有动物能够超脱周围的环境和进化所决定的需求来做一些不相干的事情,如探索问题等。例如河狸在筑坝时,它没有问自己为什么要这样做以及是否有更好的方法。因此,选项C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3894035.html
相关试题推荐
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyE
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyE
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyE
Theproblemwiththenature-nurturedebateisthatthisisaninadequateway
Theproblemwiththenature-nurturedebateisthatthisisaninadequateway
[originaltext](9)Thelaborproblemswerethelatesthadnewsforanindust
JobstresshasbecomeacommonandcostlyproblemintheAmericanworkplace,l
JobstresshasbecomeacommonandcostlyproblemintheAmericanworkplace,l
JobstresshasbecomeacommonandcostlyproblemintheAmericanworkplace,l
JobstresshasbecomeacommonandcostlyproblemintheAmericanworkplace,l
随机试题
Billalwaysdoes______hepleases,withoutregardtothefeelingsofothers.A、ho
【S1】[br]【S2】varying→vary经分析后发现,此句中缺少谓语动词,而varying是现在分词形式,不能单独充当谓语,句子前后的时态为一般现在
[originaltext]ThegoldengatebridgejoinsthebeautifulcityofSanFranc
[originaltext]M:Look,I’msorrytobotheryouaboutthis,butthatmusic’sre
根据《中华人民共和国银行业监督管理法》,中国银监会及其派出机构根据履行职责的需要
叶酸用于治疗何种贫血A.缺铁性贫血B.妊娠期巨幼红细胞性贫血C.乙胺嘧啶所致巨幼
造成牙本质细胞变性,不能形成正常牙本质是由于缺乏A.维生素D B.维生素A
在社会主义经济体制下,市场对资源配置起()作用。A.辅助性 B.先导性 C
(2016年)石化项目可能的挥发性有机物无组织排放源有()。A.物料输送管道连
围护墙采用砌体墙时,应设置()等与主体结构可靠拉结。A.拉结筋 B.滑动
最新回复
(
0
)