首页
登录
职称英语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ric
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ric
游客
2025-01-01
33
管理
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economics and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that two unique aspects of Europeans culture were crucial ingredient in EUrope’s economic growth.
First, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons—an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style—Europeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Second, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their most vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the world and put it to use—as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" on them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty, individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government. [br] According to Landes, some countries are so poor mainly because
选项
A、they tack work ethic.
B、they lack rationality.
C、they are scientifically backward.
D、they are victimized by colonists.
答案
A
解析
推断题。第二段第四句提到;The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard...,最后说明“Europeans have,on balance,followed those practices and therefore have prospered”,既然Landes认为欧洲之所以与众不同,主要是因为勤劳,由此可以推断贫穷国家是因为缺乏正确的劳动观而致贫。故A为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3893459.html
相关试题推荐
TheauthorofTheGreatGatsbyis______,whoisbestknownforhisnovelsandsh
[originaltext]AtopUnitedNationsofficialhaswarnedthateffortstoreduc
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurvey
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurvey
随机试题
Manyofthemostdamagingandlifethreateningtypesofweathertorrential
B
根据《工程建设项目施工招标投标办法》规定,某施工项目总承包招标,合同估算价为人民
下列各项中,不符合内部牵制的要求的是()。A、出纳人员管票据 B、出纳人员
以下哪项可用于检测侵袭性念珠菌感染A.1,3-β-D-葡聚糖B.半乳甘露聚糖C.
对于企业销售商品发生的销售折让,正确的会计处理是()。[2019年真题]A.增加
患者男.57岁。因心肌梗死入院,主管护士评估后确定他有以下健康问题,应优先解决的
下列不属于商业银行的合作机构风险的是()。 A.房地产商欺诈风险B.民营担
政府采购制度最早形成于18世纪末,由()政府最早创建。A.法国
某企业将在展销会上取得的收入,在公司会计账册之外另行登记。该行为属于()。A.
最新回复
(
0
)