首页
登录
职称英语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ri
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ri
游客
2024-12-22
2
管理
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economics and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that two unique aspects of Europeans culture were crucial ingredient in Europe’s economic growth.
First, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on Science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style-sEuropeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Second, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their mom vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the World and put it to use--as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" oil them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty; individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining-model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government. [br] The cultural elements identified by Landes ______ those identified by other historians.
选项
A、embrace
B、contradict
C、glorify
D、complicate
答案
A
解析
根据题干中的other historians定位至末段。首句指出Landes等人的研究目标:确定欧洲文明中的哪些普遍性因素使欧洲得以强大和现代化。第二句指出:Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty,individualism,and Christianity.可见这里是更具体的一些因素,Landes的研究范围更大,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3879534.html
相关试题推荐
Sinceitsfoundationin1954,theUnitedNationshaswrittenintoitsmajor
Sinceitsfoundationin1954,theUnitedNationshaswrittenintoitsmajor
Sinceitsfoundationin1954,theUnitedNationshaswrittenintoitsmajor
Sinceitsfoundationin1954,theUnitedNationshaswrittenintoitsmajor
Sinceitsfoundationin1954,theUnitedNationshaswrittenintoitsmajor
From1649to1658Englandwascalledacommonwealth,ruledbyOliverCromwellas
ThecommonwealthofAustraliacameintobeingon______.A、Jan.1st,1901B、Jan.1
TheAuthorizedVersionoftheBiblewaspublishedin______undertheauspicesof
______isthepseudonymofWilliamSidneyPorter,theauthorofMaggie’sGift.A、H
Aprofessorwroteinhismicroblog,"Povertyforthosewithhigher-educatio
随机试题
AbundanceIsaLifestyleI.Whatisabundance?1)al
SinceAndrewBentongraduatedfromcollegelessthanfouryearsago,hehas
A.18cmHO B.13~24cmHO C.1500ml/min D.5
肾病综合征时血浆蛋白质浓度不降低的是A.清蛋白B.铜蓝蛋白C.α巨球蛋白D.前清
红细胞缓冲系统中最重要的是A.碳酸氢钾/碳酸缓冲系统B.磷酸氢二钠/磷酸二氢钠盐
假设就是根据已知的科学原理和一定的事实材料,对未知事物的普遍规律性和因果性所作出
试简述教育学与教育方针政策、教育实践经验之间的关系。
镇肝熄风汤方中茵陈、川楝子、生麦芽的功用A.清泄肝热 B.补益肝肾 C.疏肝
职工的误餐补助属于“工资、薪金”性质的补贴收入,应计征个人所得税。()
仲裁裁决作出后,当事人应当履行裁决。一方当事人不履行的,另一方当事人可以根据《民
最新回复
(
0
)