首页
登录
职称英语
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’s
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’s
游客
2024-12-01
22
管理
问题
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’s been with the Federal Communications Commission’s new media-ownership rules. We’re told that, unless the FCC’s decision is reversed, it will worsen the menacing concentration of media power and that this will--to exaggerate only slightly--imperil free speech, the diversity of opinion and perhaps democracy itself. All this is more than overwrought; it completely misrepresents reality.
In the past 30 years, media power has splintered dramatically; people have more choices than ever. Travel back to 1970. There were only three major TV networks (ABC, CBS, NBC); now, there’s a fourth (Fox). Then, there was virtually no cable TV; now, 68 percent of households have it. Then, FM radio was a backwater; now there are 5, 892 FM stations, up from 2, 196 in 1970. Then, there was only one national newspaper (The Wall Street Journal); now, there are two more (USA Today and The New York Times).
The idea that "big media" has dangerously increased its control over our choices is absurd. Yet much of the public, including journalists and politicians, believe religiously in this myth. They confuse size with power. It’s true that some gigantic media companies are gettingeven bigger at the expense of other media companies. But it’s not true that their power is increasing at the public’s expense.
Popular hostility toward big media stems partly from the growing competition, which creates winners and losers--and losers complain. Liberals don’t like the conservative talk shows, but younger viewers do. A June poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found that viewers from the ages of 18 to 29 approved of "hosts with strong opinions" by a 58 percent to 32 percent margin. Social conservatives despise what one recently called "the raw sewage, ultrawiolence, graphic sex and raunchy languages of TV. But many viewers love it. Journalists detest the cost and profit pressures that result from stiff competition with other news and entertainment outlets.
It’s the tyranny of the market: a triumph of popular tastes. Big media companies try to anticipate, shape and profit from these tastes. But media diversity frustrates any one company from imposing its views and values on an unwilling audience. People just click to another channel or cancel their subscription. The paradox is this:the explosion of choices means that almost everyone may be offended by something. A lot of this free-floating hostility has attached itself to the FCC ownership rules.
The backlash is easily exaggerated. In the Pew poll, 51 percent of respondents knew "nothing" of the rhles; an additional 36 percent knew only "a little". The rules would permit any company to own television stations in areas with 45 percent of U. S. households, up from 35 percent now. The networks could buy more of their affiliate stations-a step that, critics say, would jeopardize "local" control and content.
At best, that’s questionable. Network programs already fill most of affiliates’ hours. To keep local audiences, any owner must satisfy local demands, especially for news and weather programming. But the symbolic backlash against the FCC and big media does pose one hidden danger. For some U. S. households, over-the-air broadcasting is the only TV available, and its long term survival is hardly ensured. Both cable and the Internet are eroding its audience. In 2002 cable programming had more prime-time viewers than broadcast programming for the first time (48 percent vs. 46 percent). Streaming video, now primitive, will improve; sooner or later--certainly in the next 10 or 15 years-many Web sites will be TV channels. If overthe-air broadcasting declines or disappears, the big losers will be the poor.
Broadcast TV will survive and flourish only if the networks remain profitable enough to bid for and provide competitive entertainment, sports and news programming. The industry’s structure must give them a long-term stake in over-the air broadcasting. Owning more TV stations is one possibility. If Congress prevents that, it may perversely hurt the very diversity and the people that it’s trying to protect. [br] When the author talks about FCC’s decision in the first paragraph,
选项
A、he is in favor of it.
B、his view is balanced.
C、he is slightly critical of it.
D、he is strongly critical of it.
答案
A
解析
态度题。由题干定位至首段。第三句句首的We’re told表明下面内容是他人的观点: it will worsen the menacing concentration of media power and that this will…imperil free speech…。末句才是作者的观点:it completely misrepresents reality,显然作者不认同前面说的“FCC的决议会危害言论自由、民主”等论调,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3868066.html
相关试题推荐
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’s
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’s
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’s
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’s
SenatorTomCoburn,aRepublican,offersasensitiveplantodothat,andestima
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.Publicspeakingisacomm
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.Publicspeakingisacomm
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.Publicspeakingisacomm
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.Publicspeakingisacomm
Ascientifictheoryisapublicpronouncementthatindicateswhatascienti
随机试题
Theyusuallyhavelessmoneyattheendofthemonththan____atthebeginning.A、
[originaltext]W:Soyouareuptosometennisthisafternoonorwhat?M:Well,
自查韦斯(HugoChavez)1999年就任总统以来,委内瑞拉与古巴两国间的经贸往来和文化交流日益增多。SinceVenezuelanPresident
DoSomethingtoImproveYourLifeWrongopin
下列对驾驶员道路训练安全防范要求,表述错误的是()。A.停车换人时,教练员必须观
男性,65岁,高血压史20年,未经规范治疗,2小时前突发剧烈头痛,伴呕吐咖啡样胃
孕妇,33岁,妊娠8周,有习惯性流产史。遵医嘱给予黄体酮肌内注射,护士正确的操作
慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的治疗包括A.应用抗菌药物 B.辅以镇静剂及心理治疗 C
人格特质理论的两个重要假设有( )。A.人格特质会在长期内发生变化 B.人格
下列规划中,属于指导特定领域发展和制定相关政策重要依据的是( )。 A.发
最新回复
(
0
)