首页
登录
职称英语
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analy
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analy
游客
2024-11-30
37
管理
问题
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
I. Character analysis
—character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis
of a Shakespearean play —characters in a typical 【B1】 doing particular things in 【B1】______
every play
—conflicts involved characters
—characters being on trial
II. Three main reasons for approaching Shakespearean plays
by analyzing characters
A. Plays with active characters like people around us
—the appeal of the genre
—seeing the play as 【B2】 itself 【B2】______
B. Shakespeare’s ability to 【B3】 characters 【B3】______
—individual personality with experience requiring an
evaluation
—individual actors’ need to 【B4】 upon the motivations 【B4】______
for their characters
C. The play including 【B5】 itself, for the reason that 【B5】______
characters are trying to understand their own characters
III. The merits and weaknesses of the approach illustrated
by 【B6】 interpretations of 19th century 【B6】______
A. Values
—always reminding of the central concern — 【B7】 【B7】______
—keeping in touch with the reason why Shakespeare 【B8】 【B8】______
B. Problems
—not enough 【B9】 about characters: 【B9】______
1) key elements full character analysis needs are 【B10】 【B10】______
2) for the lack of evidence, the analysis often ends with
trivial matters. [br] 【B7】
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
Good morning, everyone. Last time I just gave a brief introduction to the Shakespearean play, today we will go further to discuss together how to understand a Shakespearean play. The most obvious way to begin an interpretation of a Shakespearean play is by evaluating the characters. [1] Any play involves characters in a particular setting, doing particular things. The plot will develop a conflict, which will usually inflict pain or distress on some people, and will lead to a final resolution of sorts in which some characters may die or be punished severely, while others survive or triumph or get substantially rewarded. Hence, one clear entry into such a work is to put the characters on trial: Who is good? Who is bad? Why do certain people act in certain ways? Do any of the characters change? Where are my sympathies as I make my way through this play? As an interpreter, I am, in essence, the judge, and how shall I apportion my verdicts?
Interpreting a play by analyzing the characters in it, judging them, and coming to some final evaluation of them is a natural way to approach Shakespeare for three main reasons. The first is that these are plays, and they inevitably feature active characters more or less recognizably like people around us. That, indeed, is the chief appeal of the genre. [2] So it is entirely natural to treat the play as we treat life itself, by responding to the people we see, the actions they carry out, the words they use, and the decisions they make. On the basis of these observations we will come to some conclusions about the characters and will discuss the play in those terms.
[3] The second reason is that Shakespeare is famous, more than anyone else, for his astonishing ability to create interesting, complex, and natural characters. Unlike many other dramatists whose characters do not invite very complex investigation, Shakespeare has the ability to fill a play with scores of characters, each of whom talks in a language and acts in a way which indicates a sharply focused individual personality with a very particular response to experience. Hence, it is, once again, natural to treat them as fully realized people whose conduct requires an evaluative judgment.
Then, too, the fact that we are dealing with plays always keeps the approach through character analysis alive,[4] because theatre productions depend upon individual actors, and individual actors need to reflect upon the motivations for their characters. They have to, in a sense, discover their human qualities and become the stage people whose lives they enact. Thus, the dramatic tradition of continuing to mount Shakespeare productions ensures that the analysis of character will remain a powerful force in the interpretation of the plays.
The third major reason why character analysis is an important approach to Shakespeare’s plays is (as Harold Bloom has repeatedly pointed out) that Shakespeare’s characters are often intrigued or puzzled by their own characters. That is, they make their characters part of the dramatic "problem" of the fiction we are exploring. When, for example, Hamlet or Macbeth or Othello starts to wrestle with his own character, trying to understand his own motivation, feelings, and actions, that moment places the nature of the character as an essential element in the work (in a way that is markedly different from texts in which a character’s personality does not create particular problems for him). [5] In other words, the plays themselves put character analysis directly on the table.
The approach to a Shakespeare play which places the analysis of character at the centre of the process was particularly strong in the nineteenth century, [6] and the literary interpretations from that period often illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of that approach. [7] The great value of character analysis is that it always reminds us that, whatever else we may want to talk of, the central concern is particular human beings. Whatever else King Lear is about, it is centrally about a suffering old man, whose unique character brings upon him almost unimaginable suffering. Whatever we make of Hamlet, we cannot forget that the people in the play drive Ophelia insane and lead her to suicide, and that she is an innocent and loving young woman. [8] Focusing upon the characters in the play always keeps us in touch with a major reason why Shakespeare matters — his works constantly illuminate human nature in all sorts of moving ways.
That said, however, treating the interpretation of a play as primarily a matter of evaluating character can create problems. [9] One major problem, of course, is that in many instances we do not know enough about a character to arrive at a sufficiently full understanding of his or her personality. We know almost nothing of Hamlet’s childhood, or Bolingbroke’s inner thoughts, or Lady Macbeth’s sexuality. [10] Thus, key elements required in any lull character analysis are missing. Of course, we can speculate on such matters, but such speculations can often end up in inconclusive and often trivial debates, because there is not enough evidence. So we can find criticism by the analysis of character degenerating into explorations of the girlhood of Shakespeare’s heroines, endless arguments about whether or not the Macbeths had any children, how old Hamlet might be or whether he is really insane or not, whether Falstaff is a coward or not, how black Othello really is, or what Antony and Cleopatra really talk about when they are alone together. Shakespearean plays are great inheritance as well as wealth for the humankind. The characters in his plays give us lots of insights to know and to talk with Shakespeare’s soul. I hope my lecture has led you on the way to the thought of this great player. Thank you for listening.
选项
答案
human beings
解析
本题所在处考查人物分析方法的优点。讲座中说到,The great value ofcharacter analysis is that it always reminds usthat,whatever else we may want to talk of,thecentral concern is particular human beings,即无论我们谈论什么,人物分析的最大价值在于其总是提醒我们不能离开关注的中心——人类。因此答案为human beings。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3867081.html
相关试题推荐
CharacterAnalysisofShakespeareanPlaysI.Characteranaly
CharacterAnalysisofShakespeareanPlaysI.Characteranaly
CharacterAnalysisofShakespeareanPlaysI.Characteranaly
CharacterAnalysisofShakespeareanPlaysI.Characteranaly
CharacterAnalysisofShakespeareanPlaysI.Characteranaly
CharacterAnalysisofShakespeareanPlaysI.Characteranaly
Whitman’spoemsarecharacterizedbyallthefollowingfeaturesEXCEPT______A、t
"Fossilization"isanimportantcharacteristicofthe______.A、nativelanguageB、
Manytypically"American"characteristicsarearesultofvalue.【M1】______
Manytypically"American"characteristicsarearesultofvalue.【M1】______
随机试题
Heunderwentfour______operationsintwoweeks.A、excessiveB、extensiveC、intensi
下列不属于局限性皮肤瘙痒症好发部位的是()A.肛门 B.阴囊 C.
共用题干 第一篇ApproachestoUnderstandingInt
对早产儿和新生儿易造成听神经和肾功能损害的药物是A.卡那霉素B.对乙酰氨基酚C.
对学生考试通过率进行区间估计,已知样本通过率为p,样本容量为n。下列适用正态分布
小明学习成绩优异,在考试中经常获得第一名,但小明妈妈看邻居的孩子都报了培训班,于
有构造柱的砌体结构施工时,应当()。A:先砌筑砖墙,后浇筑构造柱混凝土B:先浇
组合结果数据在不同风险管理领域的一致应用,是商业银行最终实现准确经济资本计量的关
结构分析法除了用于单个客户利润表相关项目的分析外,还经常用于同行业平均水平比较分
男性,32岁,反复发生腹痛,反酸12年。2周来上述症状加重,并出现夜间痛,进食后
最新回复
(
0
)