首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext]W: Welcome to our program. This week, I would like to talk about
[originaltext]W: Welcome to our program. This week, I would like to talk about
游客
2024-11-22
40
管理
问题
W: Welcome to our program. This week, I would like to talk about what science and comedy have in common. Welcome, Adam.
M: Thank you.
W: Imagine that a physicist and a chemist walk into a bar. Or is it a physicist and a biologist? There’s a reason science and comedy don’t usually mingle—but to biologist and comedian Adam Ruben, the two are related in more ways than one.(1)Ruben uses insights from his Ph. D. training and years working in a lab to write Experimental Error, a humor column for Science Careers. He will share interesting things with us. So Adam, what science and comedy have in common?
M: Well,(2)I think something that they have in common that people forget is that they’re both serious pursuits. I think a common misperception of comedy is that it’s not something serious, it’s not a real field.(3)And I really wanted to teach a class on standup comedy—the history of standup comedy and its impact on society. And I pitched this class, and I was eventually told by the committee that they would never accept this class because it just wasn’t about a serious topic. And I think it’s a shame to dismiss comedy. It’s as serious as any other form of self-expression or social commentary. But science sort of already gets that, that little benefit of everyone hears science and they assume it’s serious.
W: We know that you’re a funny guy, but are you funny in the lab or do you keep your scientist side separated from your comedian side?
M: (4)I actually really do kind of keep the two separated, and that’s mainly because I’m paranoid.(5)If you try to be funny in the lab too much, people will use it as the ready excuse for anything that goes wrong in the lab—Oh, well, it’s because he’s focusing too much on trying to be funny. I had an experience in grad school where my advisor found out that I did standup on the side, and all of a sudden it kind of became the reason why my experiments weren’t working. He said, oh, it’s because your mind is not on science, it’s on standup comedy.
This is the end of Part One of the interview. Questions 1 to 5 are based on what you have just heard.
1. What can we know about the interviewee from the interview?
2. Which of the following statements about the similarity between science and comedy is CORRECT?
3. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
4. How does the interviewee behave in the lab?
5. According to the interviewee, what is likely to be the consequence of being funny in the lab?
选项
A、It will reduce the pressure of the experiment.
B、It will distract people from their research.
C、It will give people the excuse for mistakes.
D、It will add inspiration and creativity to the lab.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3856341.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartTwooftheinterview.W:Thistaskforcehas
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.W:(1)Whenyougotothe
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.W:(1)Whenyougotothe
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.W:(1)Whenyougotothe
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartTwooftheinterview.M:Whatwasshockingwa
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartTwooftheinterview.M:Whatwasshockingwa
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartTwooftheinterview.M:Whatwasshockingwa
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.W:I’mKellyKleinand
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.W:I’mKellyKleinand
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.W:I’mKellyKleinand
随机试题
Itseemslikeeverydaythere’ssomenewresearchaboutwhetherourfavorite
Theseso-calledfactsaretheproductofconsiderable______intheanalysisande
下列关于混凝土缓凝剂的叙述中,哪一项是正确的? A.掺了早强剂的混凝土不可掺缓
(2018年真题)根据《继承法》,下列关于遗赠的说法,错误的是()。A.遗
生活自理障碍分为三个等级,具体为()。A.生活完全可以自理 B.生活完全不能
人在每一瞬间,将心理活动选择了某些对象而忽略了另一些对象。这一特点指的是注意的(
《中华人民共和国刑法》规定,商业银行和()等机构,违背受托义务,擅自运用客户资
知识作为教学目标,其所要求的心理过程是()。
知识点:外阴组成外阴组成不包括 A.阴阜 B.大阴唇 C.小阴唇 D.
尿频、尿痛、血尿和脓尿为A.肾结核的主要临床表现 B.肾结石的主要临床表现
最新回复
(
0
)