首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
游客
2024-10-31
71
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals. [br] The following things about the railroads aroused public resentment EXCEPT ______ .
选项
A、their political power
B、high fares
C、the economic loss
D、their indifference toward individuals
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在文章的结尾段,讲述了人们对这类案件态度的改变,以及造成态度转变的因素。A、B、D三项均符合文意,只有C项文中未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3825803.html
相关试题推荐
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainsta
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainsta
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainsta
StudentsofUnitedStateshistory,seekingtoidentifythecircumstancesth
StudentsofUnitedStateshistory,seekingtoidentifythecircumstancesth
StudentsofUnitedStateshistory,seekingtoidentifythecircumstancesth
AlthoughtheUnitedStatescherishesthetraditionitisanationofsmall
AlthoughtheUnitedStatescherishesthetraditionitisanationofsmall
Beforethemid-1860’s,theimpactoftherailroadsintheUnitedStateswas
Agoodmarriagemeansgrowingasacouplebutalsogrowingasindividuals.
随机试题
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECT?[originaltext](9)Thefiery
Maryhopedthatthisjobwouldserveasafirm_______forherchosencareer.A、bas
Thebesttitleforthispassageis______.[br]Robotscanperformmanydifferen
【B1】[br]【B5】A、effectedB、affectedC、influencedD、interferedC本题考查词的用法。influenc
Sincewearesocialbeings,thequalityofourlivesdependsinlargemeasur
Theadvantagesanddisadvantagesofalargepopulationhavelongbeena(1)__
PASSAGETHREE[br]Accordingtothepassage,whatdoestheexampleofAirbnbsho
没有明显的分析活动,没有严密的逻辑推理,个体往往“知其然而不知其所以然”,这反映
下列属于细胞周期非特异性药物的是A.羟基脲 B.丝裂霉素 C.阿糖胞苷 D
()是指原告请求法院通过判决改变或消灭与被告之间现存的某种民事关系的诉讼。A.确
最新回复
(
0
)