首页
登录
职称英语
It is refreshing to see an international organization not only subjecting i
It is refreshing to see an international organization not only subjecting i
游客
2024-10-30
20
管理
问题
It is refreshing to see an international organization not only subjecting itself to criticism but also publishing the results. A report published today by the International Development Association which lends on highly concessionary terms to the poorest countries, deserves credit on both counts. But the reasons for producing this sizeable document say as much about the crisis facing aid agencies as they do about the recipients of aid.
In the nature of things the document is self-justificatory. It would be curious indeed for a group of international civil servants enjoying substantial tax-free salaries to recommend their own disbandment.The report concludes that without IDA, the situation in the world’s poorest countries "would have been even worse, and the needs today even greater".
Leaving aside whether one can say what would have happened otherwise, there is no doubt that in the 22 years since its inception IDA has been diligent. It has committed $27,000m to 1,302 projects in 78 countries. This year disbursements will be about $2,100m, despite the argument over IDA’s funding which has left it with less money than expected.
All of these considerable sums have gone to the poorest countries on generous terms. No country with a per capita income of more than $730 is eligible for IDA assistance, and in 1980 no less than 80 percent of net disbursements were to countries with per capita incomes of only $410. When incomes are so desperately low, it is not surprising that the terms allow repayment over 50 years without interest.
Nevertheless, as IDA candidly admits, measuring the effectiveness of such aid is difficult. It insists that projects must pay for themselves. In effect, the rate of return must provide the borrowing government with revenue to meet its obligations or else the loan becomes a subsidy. [br] What qualifies a country for financial aid from IDA?
选项
A、A per capita income of more than $730.
B、A per capita income of less than $410.
C、A per capita income of more than ∮2,100.
D、A per capita income of less than $730.
答案
D
解析
本题询问什么样的国家有资格获得IDA的经济援助。相关语句为“No country with a per capita in come or more than $730 is eligible for IDA assistance”,就是说A country with a per capita income of less than $730 is eligible for IDA assistance。 只有D是符合此意的。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3823258.html
相关试题推荐
Itisrefreshingtoseeaninternationalorganizationnotonlysubjectingi
Itisrefreshingtoseeaninternationalorganizationnotonlysubjectingi
Somepeoplebelievethatinternationalsportcreatesgoodwillbetweenthen
AccordingtotheU.N.FoodandAgriculturalOrganization,howmuchwillZimbabwe
Themuseumwasbuiltinmemoryofthose[br][originaltext] TheInternational
Themuseumwasbuiltinmemoryofthose[originaltext] TheInternationalRedCr
TheU.N.InternationalAtomicEnergyAgency______[br][originaltext]The
TheU.N.InternationalAtomicEnergyAgency______[originaltext]TheU.N.I
Thisnewsitemisabout[originaltext]Internationalmediatorshavepostpone
WhatdidtheinternationalgroupperceiveinAfghanistan?[br][originaltext]
随机试题
Thingshavereallychanged.Notonlyisthemilitarystandingtallagain,it
ConversationalSkillsPeoplewhousuallymakeusfee
DearSirorMadam,Manythanksforyourletter.Wearegladtohearthatyou
Thedifferencebetweenaliquidandagasisobvious【C1】______theconditions
Accordingtoarecentstudy,theideaofagingmightlookdifferentthrought
以下属于泡沫喷雾灭火系统中储气瓶组部分一般缺陷的是()(A)压缩氮气的储存压力过
如图所示,立方体上叠加圆柱体在打通一个圆柱孔,然后从任意面剖开,下面哪一项不可能
吴越历史舞台的中心在哪里,多年来一直是学者与公众共同关注的焦点。尽管古籍文献对此
泡沫灭火系统地下式消火栓顶部与井盖底面的距离不大于()m,且不小于井盖半径,即
下列有关《海牙规则》《维斯比规则》《汉堡规则》及我国《海商法》的表述,哪些选项是
最新回复
(
0
)