2. 职称英语
  3. [A]junction[I]manipulate [B]employ[J]plausible [C]literally[K]contra

[A]junction[I]manipulate [B]employ[J]plausible [C]literally[K]contra

游客2024-09-17  37
问题     [A]junction[I]manipulate
    [B]employ[J]plausible
    [C]literally[K]contrarily
    [D]ranks[L]statistical
    [E]rationalize[M]meditate
    [F]elite[N]destructive
    [G]advantageous[O]justifications
    [H]signify
    I’ve been twice to college-admissions wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. It’s one-upmanship among parents. We see our kids’ college【C1】______as trophies(战利品)attesting to how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various【C2】______that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths.
    We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough trophies to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever.
    Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce【C3】______degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that’s【C4】______—and mostly wrong. Selective schools don’t systematically【C5】______better instructional approaches than less-selective schools. Some do; some don’t. On two measures—professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams—selective schools do slightly worse.
    By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2 percent to 4 percent for every 100-point increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a【C6】______fluke(侥幸). A well-known study by Princeton economist Alan Krueger and Stacy Berg Dale of Mathematica Policy Research examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from other schools.
    Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may【C7】______intelligence, talent and ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,【C8】______, its significance is declining. The reason; so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into college isn’t life’s only competition. In the next competition—the job market, graduate school—the results may change. Old-boy networks are breaking down. Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph. D. program. High scores on the Graduate Record Exam helped explain who got in; Ivy League degrees didn’t.
    So, parents, lighten up. The stakes have been vastly exaggerated. Up to a point, we can【C9】______our pushiness(一意孤行). America is a competitive society; our kids need to adjust to that. But too much pushiness can be【C10】______. The very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment. One study of students 20 years out found that, other things being equal, graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction. They may have been so conditioned to being on top that anything less disappoints. [br] 【C6】
选项
答案 L
解析 根据空格前的a和空格后的fluke可推断，此处缺少一个形容词作定语。前一句说，一些研究表明，重点学校的确增加了其毕业生的收入。一所学校的平均SAT分数每增加100分，其学生的收入就会增加2％～4％，而后面提到的研究得出的结论却是重点学校的毕业生的收入和其他学校的学生一样多。由此可推知，空格所在句为转折句，说明这种优势也可能只是统计学上的偶然，故[L]statistical“统计(学)的”为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3762243.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)