首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2024-09-16
35
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering seems the way ahead. It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far they are from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant: the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] Which of the following is NOT mentioned about scientists in earlier times?
选项
A、They invented false theories to explain things they didn’t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know all about nature.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。第二段第六句提到,以前我们或假装知道事情的来龙去脉,或对问题置之不理,或者干脆编造故事来填补我们的无知。A,B,D三项符合文意,故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3760480.html
相关试题推荐
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Nutritionisthescienceoffood,itsusewithinthebody,anditsrelations
Nutritionisthescienceoffood,itsusewithinthebody,anditsrelations
AnAustralianresearchgroupmayeasehumanity’scollectiveconscienceover
Theword"open"isreallyusedalot.You’veprobablyheard"openup"inman
(l)TheWestlifestoryreallybeganwaybackinDecember1996whenthethree
(l)TheWestlifestoryreallybeganwaybackinDecember1996whenthethree
Advanceinsciencemoreoftenthannotencounterspowerfulopposition,_____Dar
Whichofthefollowingunderlinedwordsindicatesprediction?A、Iwillneverspea
随机试题
Mywifedidn’t______withwhatyousuggestedtous.A、agreetoB、believeinC、list
TheUnitedStatesisconsideredamultilingualcountrybutithasneveremp
Researchershavesuggestedthatone’semotionalintelligence(EQ)isagreater
根据《水利工程质量管理规定》,关于项目各参与方的责任的说法,错误的有()A
下列各医疗区的细菌学指标是( ) 空气(cfu/㎡) 物体表面(c
蛛网膜下腔出血患者,意识清楚,查体发现一侧眼睑下垂,伴瞳孔散大和对光反应消失,应
有一绝热容器,中间用隔板分成两部分,左侧是理想气体,右侧是真空。现将隔板抽掉,让
2019年城镇非私营单位工资低于当年非私营单位平均工资的行业有:A.
根据材料,除印度外,我国对主要国家和地区货物进出口总额增长率最高的国家(地区)的
某市市政自来水管网某段流量异常,疑似泄露,施工人员决定使用故障检测技术探明管道缺
最新回复
(
0
)